***Clinton Woods will EXPOSE Chad Dawson***

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ishy, Feb 14, 2009.

  1. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    33,921
    Likes Received:
    135
    Woods doesnt have a chance in hell against Dawson,he got beat by a way past is best Tarver,hows he going to beat Chad.
     
  2. Fat Tony

    Fat Tony Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,055
    Likes Received:
    1
    Woods and Minto are clearly the best boxers in the world; everyone's ducking them. Dawson will never dare to step in the ring with Woods.
     
  3. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,284
    Likes Received:
    0
    so how'd you score the fight? HOE-CAKE.

    :think
     
  4. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,158
    Likes Received:
    2
    :rofl This one filed away for future use :good

    As far as I remember teh fight swung backwards and forwards and I can certainly understand why people could have given it to Dawson, I just don't agree.

    As I remember I had Johnson winning by a couple of rounds 115-113.

    Dawson 1-3, 7,8
    Johnson 4-6, 9-12 (maybe 9 even)

    Whoever you think won, it was never a 116-112 fight to either fighter
     
  5. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,284
    Likes Received:
    0
    and yet you call this fight a "robbery"..........idiot :patsch
     
  6. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,158
    Likes Received:
    2
    I am trying to be polite...you forgot to highlight the money words dickweed.... "I don't agree". If you don't see 116-112 as a ****ing robbery then you are more of a demonstrable moron than you already portray on here.:good
     
  7. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    :lol:
     
  8. jaycuban

    jaycuban Cubans Do It Better ! Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,259
    Likes Received:
    2
    clinton woods ? are you serious ?
     
  9. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Messages:
    38,466
    Likes Received:
    21
    Yes,and then Bernard Hopkins if he stops ducking him.
    Besides everyone knows the Jones fight was fixed.Hell Roy was gonna get a SD only on the ring walk.And Clinton was intimidated by ut.Don't you watch wrestling?
     
  10. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    3,589
    Likes Received:
    1
    This thread is laughable.
     
  11. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2008
    Messages:
    44,755
    Likes Received:
    7
  12. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    12,013
    Likes Received:
    3
    Facepalm thread.

    Woods is garbage, please don't hype this fight or it might actually happen.

    We've seen enough easy defences from Chad, this would be another.
     
  13. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,843
    Likes Received:
    13
    all these hits for Clinton WTF Woods? Clinton Woods FFS. UN****INGBELIEVEABLE........................................
     
  14. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    46,399
    Likes Received:
    15
    I think Dawson is WAY overrated, but Woods is past his best and would lose on points in a competitive encounter.

    He also struggles fighting abroad..... Dawson has already proven that he doesn't like flying by giving up the WBC title.... so it would have to be in the US - Dawson UD.

    Not a chance of a stoppage though, Clinton has probably the best chin of any British fighter of recent years.
     
  15. larrysmith

    larrysmith Guest

    clinton woods????lmfao.