Let's put an end to the BULL**** about the contract: Wlad/Haye

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by WiDDoW_MaKeR, Feb 18, 2009.


Page 1 of 7
  1. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    This was from David Haye a while back during negotiations....


    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
    British heavyweight boxer David Haye could fight both Klitschko brothers as part of a sensational two-for-one contract being thrashed out by lawyers. Speaking to Setanta Sports News Haye admitted that the two-for-one contract was “being talked about”. He said:

    “To be number one in the world, to be the undisputed champion, I feel I’ve got to beat both of them anyway. That’s not a problem. I want to fight both of them. It’s down to the lawyers now.”

    http://www.boxingnews24.com/2009/02...h-klitschkos-quezada-and-joe-goossen-team-up/
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    STRAIGHT FROM DAVID HAYE'S OWN MOUTH!

    Do you guys now understand that this is something that Haye wanted? Haye himself is the one who wanted shots at both of the Klitschkos. Stop acting like it was some crazy clause put into the contract. The Klitschko brothers are giving Haye an opportunity to become the Undisputed Champion of the division by granting him a shot at the WBC, IBF, WBO, IBO titles... which would also lead to a Ring Magazine Championship Title if he were to win against them. The deal was simple even according to Haye's manager. If Haye beat Wlad, then obviously Wlad would get a rematch. If Haye beat Wlad again then Haye would be given a shot at Vitali and the WBC title as well. THIS IS WHAT DAVID HAYE WANTS! Why on earth wouldn't he? 3 huge fights, 3 huge paydays and a chance to become the undisputed Champion of the division.

    David Haye wanted this scenario which is why he agreed to it. Stop acting like this was some sort of problem as far as getting this fight done. This part of the contract was agreed to on BOTH sides.
     
    WiDDoW_MaKeR, Feb 18, 2009
    WiDDoW_MaKeR, Feb 18, 2009
    #1
  2. Boxfan1

    Boxfan1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,813
    4
    Dec 17, 2005
    This just proves that David Haye was never serious about fighting either Wlad or Vitali. The guy is nothing more than a windbag who is a legend in his own mind.
     
    Boxfan1, Feb 18, 2009
    Boxfan1, Feb 18, 2009
    #2
  3. BremnerBomber

    BremnerBomber Guest


    Yeh thats exactly what it proves :patsch

    Have you anything to say about Haye getting Shafer to reignite negotiations ?
     
    BremnerBomber, Feb 18, 2009
    BremnerBomber, Feb 18, 2009
    #3
  4. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Haye said that he would agree to a contract to fight both Klitschkos.

    What K2 want to insert in the contract is open options on Hayes two subsequent fights, which they could stipulate to be against anyone at all.

    That's not at all the same thing.
     
    Cobbler, Feb 18, 2009
    Cobbler, Feb 18, 2009
    #4
  5. TRUEBELIEVER 66

    TRUEBELIEVER 66 Guest

    Id rather see Wlad fight Arreola:deal Arreola would give either Klitchko a harder fight than glass chin Haye anyways..
    Typical fighter nowadays they all talk ****-trash, but when it comes time to face a serious challenge, 90% of them wimp out like little ****s.
     
    TRUEBELIEVER 66, Feb 18, 2009
    TRUEBELIEVER 66, Feb 18, 2009
    #5
  6. vonBanditos

    vonBanditos MĪƒderator Full Member

    2,577
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    Arreola is a waste of time. You might as well have said you'd prefer to watch Wladimir masturbate.
     
    vonBanditos, Feb 18, 2009
    vonBanditos, Feb 18, 2009
    #6
  7. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    I understand that.

    What I have problems with is the clause that requires him to vacate both titles if he is enforced with a mandatory before getting a shot at Vitali Klitschko.

    This mean's Haye wouldn't be able to unify the IBF, WBO & WBC titles together at any one time.
     
    TommyV, Feb 18, 2009
    TommyV, Feb 18, 2009
    #7
  8. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    That is what David Haye wants. The only mandatory that could be enforced on him would be the IBF. Do you honestly believe that Haye would put off a fight against Vitali to defend against Povetkin? HELL NO! Let alone the fact that the IBF would most likely give him an extension for the unification fight. Let's not forget that Povetkin would also be FAST to agree to step-aside and let Haye fight Vitali with the promise to then get a shot at the winner and the undisputed Champion. That would ALSO be the best case scenario for Povetkin.

    Even if Haye was stripped of the IBF... do you honestly think that he would give a ****?:lol: The man would be considered the Undisputed Champion of the division.

    None of this matters anyways, because Haye won't be making it past Wlad.:D
     
    WiDDoW_MaKeR, Feb 18, 2009
    WiDDoW_MaKeR, Feb 18, 2009
    #8
  9. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    :good
     
    ishy, Feb 18, 2009
    ishy, Feb 18, 2009
    #9
  10. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    Obviously you and Haye's manager aren't on the same page. Booth said in that quote that THOSE ARE THE OPTIONS THAT THEY REQUESTED!
     
    WiDDoW_MaKeR, Feb 18, 2009
    WiDDoW_MaKeR, Feb 18, 2009
    #10
  11. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Why are they trying to get control over the whole situation though?

    If Haye beats Wlad, then let him sort negotiations with Vitali himself, let him decide whether he should fight his mandatory or not.

    It shouldn't be up to Wlad's team.

    They're trying to pull the strings even if he's not going to be champ anymore. All there doing is trying to dictate Haye's future for him. Let him and Booth decide who they fight and when they fight them, not team Klitschko.
     
    TommyV, Feb 18, 2009
    TommyV, Feb 18, 2009
    #11
  12. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Two matches against the Klitschkos not the same as K2 having open options on two Haye fights against whoever they choose.

    Not a complicated point.
     
    Cobbler, Feb 18, 2009
    Cobbler, Feb 18, 2009
    #12
  13. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,865
    3,115
    Apr 16, 2005
    Who cares? Either Klitschko will destroy the glass-jawed Haye in a couple of rounds. Jeez, this guy can't even take the shots of old cruisers and supermiddles. All he's doing is postponing his rendezvous with the canvas! :nod
     
    Zakman, Feb 18, 2009
    Zakman, Feb 18, 2009
    #13
  14. Aint no stoppin

    Aint no stoppin Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,191
    937
    Dec 15, 2008

    Right get that widdow maker!! Gettt thatttttt!:patsch
     
    Aint no stoppin, Feb 18, 2009
    Aint no stoppin, Feb 18, 2009
    #14
  15. yesihavearm2

    yesihavearm2 ESB Chinchecker Full Member

    9,890
    5,155
    May 30, 2008
    No Widdow, whats bull**** is that you and others on this site are claiming that Haye brings nothing more than anyother challenger to the table when Haye and Booth have said that they bring nearly $2mill more to the table than Arreloa would and that they were giving up their fee to Wlad, all they were asking in return is the UK rights.
     
    yesihavearm2, Feb 18, 2009
    yesihavearm2, Feb 18, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 7