You're the one who brought up Valuev, and I ****ing shattered your argument into a million pieces. Now he's all of a sudden offtopic? I'm convinced that you will never be convinced. I'd need a ****ing crowbar to get your mouth off the Klit bros' nutsacks...And now Valuev's.:yep
You're owning yourself and getting owned by everyone else here...Only you're too god damn stupid to see it. :rofl:rofl:rofl
Look, I asked for 5 boxers with a better resumee in those 4 pretty easy to check categories. So far only 1 boxer has been mentioned: Foreman. Foreman has a better resumee in 2 of the 4 categories (only if you overlook Foreman's crappy opposition, but I didn't ask for quality of opposition). Until counter-proof Wlad HAS ONE OF THE BEST HEAVYWEIGHT RECORDS EVER. I understand that it's hard to believe for some in hate-mode BUT IT IS AS IT IS.
Quality of opposition is all there is to look at in a resume. Now you're back to records? Which is it?
What the heck? YOU brought up Valuev first. Aaah, back to insulting since your *cough* better opponents list failed.
Hate mode? Perhaps it seems that way to you, because you are ultra defensive and pro-Wlad. So, which of Wlad's wins are better than the win over little Frazier?
I brought up Valuev only to disprove your weight argument. You're the one who had to go and call him one of the greatest ever, and mother****ers are laughing at you in another thread as we speak for that ridiculous statement. Insults are what you get for being such a dumb ****, and I've been insulting your stupid ass all along, so I'm not going back to anything. Also, that list wasn't mine, but every one of those guys listed had a better resume than WALD. :deal
Record is the whole record. Fight by fight. Resumee is something like "He won the world title 5 times" (factual) or "He won against top quality opposition" (opinion). I asked for factual resumee (because this is where there is the least doubt about it and which is the easiest to check). I did not ask for quality of opposition (because that would instantly exclude Langford, Marciano and others). I am still waiting for 4 boxers with a better resumee than Klitschko in 2 of the 4 aforementioned categories: 1) Wins in heavyweight title fights against 200+ opponents 2) KOs in heavyweight fights against 200+ opponents 3) Wins against 200+ opponents 4) KOs against 200+ opponents And, ahem, INSULT IS NOT AN ANSWER
How old are you knn? Are allowed to stay up late and watch real live boxing matches? ...otherwise Im seriously struggling to comprehend your reasoning.
Because Wlad (the current champion) is getting bashed in this thread. Start a new thread. This is offtopic here.