Wlad klitschko better than Ali!!!!!!

I only compared WIN-opponents of Ali vs WIN-opponents of Wlad. Not Holmes and Berbick. It's probably true that Wlad never faced anyone like Holmes. But that is a completely different question.

 

THE ONES WHERE I PROVED WHAT YOU WERE SAYING WASN'T EVEN VALID...GO BACK AND READ THE WHOLE THREAD AND YOU CAN SEE WHERE OTHER POSTERS DONT EVEN TAKE YOU SERIOUS...

U NEVER ANSWERED MY QUESTIONS ABOUT PURRITY AND SANDERS AND BREWSTER...:think I OWN YOU!!

 

MAN SHUT UP..UR POSTS ARE GARBAGE AND YOU TRULY NEED HELP...OTHER ESB POSTERS ARE TALKIN MAD $HIT SAYIN U DON'T KNOW YOUR BOXING..IT WOULD BE 1 THING IF IT WERE JUSS ME SAYIN IT..BUT WHEN 5 OR 6 OTHER POSTERS THINK WHAT YOU SAY GETS NO CREDIBILITY...THAN YOU SHOULD PROLLY ADMIT YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT UR TALKIN BOUT RATHER THAN BE A FU34IN BABY!:deal TAKE NOTES

 

You are deducting way too much from 3 losses. Can you imagine I would have a 3-50 fighter and I would deduct things from his 3 wins? Moreover the freakest loss is avenged. Get over it. Clay lost, too.

 

GET OVER IT...LOOK AT THE POLE NUMBERS??? YOU LOST JUSS FACE IT MAN I OWN U ON THIS FORUM

ONCE AGAIN...I KNOW CLAY LOST...IM NOT A CLAY FAN..IMA FAN OF BOXING IN GENERAL...I RANK WLAD IN MY TOP 250 IF HE'S LUCKY AND THATS RANKING HIM TO HIGH PROLLY..I RANK CLAY AKA ALI IN MY TOP 4....

JUSS CUZ IM ARGUING FOR CLAY DON'T MEAN IM A FAN..ILL SIT HERE AND TELL U WLAD WILL BEAT ERY 1 IN THE HW DIVISION TODAY EXCEPT HIS BRO...DON'T MEAN IMA FAN OF EITHER..I JUSS TELL IT LIKE I SEE IT!!

 

I did. I said Brewster, Sanders and Purrity are 2 punch classes above Ali, besides: 1) Brewster is avenged 2) Sanders is a southpaw and 3) Ross was 40 lbs heavier than prime Ali.

You can not deduct a single thing from these losses. Rather deduct something from Klitschko's wins than some unavenged loss 14 fights ago.

A loss against these punchers in no way shows how Wlad-Clay would end. The same way a loss against bum Young does not show how Foreman-Wlad would end.

Maybe from these losses you could deduct something how a pre-Sanders-Wlad vs prime-Ali would end. But this is completely offtopic.

 

And what exactly has this fantasy poll to do with my post about actual factual career ACHIEVEMENTS?

And good they they didn't have polls in the medieval ages about the flatness of the earth.

 

And you own a place in Clay's heart. He was also a notorious insulter.

 

You are a true artist with these smilies. I am glad you found them because otherwise your post would be pretty empty.

 

STYLES MAKE FIGHTS...WLAD IS A ROBOT AND ERY 1 KNOWS THAT..ALI IS QUICK HANDED AND HAS POWER IN THE SAME CATEGORY AS WLAD...T

HE ONLY ADVANTAGE WLAD HAS OVER ALI IS A SLIGHT ADVANTAGE IN POWER...ALI WINS IN TECHNICALITIES, HANDSPEED, FOOTSPEED,BETTER FOOTWORK, DEFENSE, SMARTER FIGHTER, BETTER CHIN, RING GENERALSHIP, ALI FOUGHT BETTER OPPOSITION...ALI IS ALSO A BETTER ATHLETE THUS GIVING HIM THE ATHLETIC ADVANTAGE...:deal

THE ONLY THING WLAD DOES BETTER THAN ALI IS SPEAK 7 LANGUAGES!!

 

than go make a poll and thread that states who has the better career achievements and throw in vitali wlad and ali...hell throw in formane too! Lets see who wins the numbers on that 1!

Once again i am not a big fan of ali's..i simply state the facts as they are and klitchko would not beat ali on his best night!

 

Otherwise 8-language-Clay would be the greatest insulter the world has ever seen. He could clinch the Mexican opponent while insulting the Serbian referee.

 

THIS HERE SHOWS YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY ON THIS FORUM..U SAID ALI WAS BORING...KLITCHKO IS BORING...WHERE DO YOU RANK YOUR BOY ATG...TOP 5:rofl:rofl:rofl I KEEP MAKIN U LOOK LIKE A FOOL MAN..U MUST LIVE IN EUROPE OR UR FROM EUROPE CUZ UR VERY AMETUER WITH YOUR KNOWLEDGE ON THE SPORT..:bbb

 

I know that Ali would win that Poll. So? Just the opinion of voters. Not fact.

The Ring Mag put Sam Langford (18% KOrate against non-bums) at #2 of the best punchers of the world. They have obviously no clue because noone ACTUALLY CHECKS THE RECORDS. It's all delusion.

 

This content is protected