WTF is going on with the Lightweight Division ???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by psychopath, Feb 21, 2009.

  1. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,390
    Likes Received:
    2
    I've just posted a thread questioning why WBA is sanctioning Diaz vs JMM as a WBA SuperChamp title fight when none of these two fighters are a WBA title holder . . . saddest part is they have a legitimate title holder who is being by passed.

    Now there's another thread saying that the IBF title will be at stake in a fight between the rated #8 Romanov and Joan Guzman who is not even at the IBF top 15 ratings.

    Can somebody explain that ???
     
  2. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2007
    Messages:
    6,506
    Likes Received:
    1,761
    Guzman is ranked at 7. Others are probably unavailable, Funeka and Angulo just lost, Peterson injured, Julio Diaz fights at the LW tournament, therefore the two highest ranked and available fighters are Guzman and Romanov. I think that's cool.

    But the WBA sanctioning Marquez-Diaz is a big fat joke, I agree. It's simply a money reason. I believe all 3 santcioning bodies walked away from the Campbell-Funeka fight without the sanctioning fee, as Nate didn't make weight and Funake didn't win, so the easiest way to make some money on short notice, is to give the title to the upcoming decent money fight, which is Marquez-Diaz.

    What an absolute joke that is, corrupt motherf*ers they are all.
     
  3. Monstar

    Monstar The Future.. Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    11,166
    Likes Received:
    0
    .....i dont think anyone can
     
  4. It's just the beauty of boxing nowadays.

    At least it could be argued that the fighters concerned are some of the very best in the division.
     
  5. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    9,468
    Likes Received:
    377
    Just more proof, if you need any, that none of the sanctioning bodies care about anything except lining their own pockets.
    Champion, Super-Champion, Champion Emiritus - they don't care one little bit that they're devaluing their own titles, and the sport in general, as long as they get to fleece fighters for an extra few dollars.
     
  6. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    17,376
    Likes Received:
    309
    i cant understand the wba here
     
  7. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    25,227
    Likes Received:
    27
    The Lightweight division is muddied as hell.
     
  8. Devintea

    Devintea Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,248
    Likes Received:
    3
    Money matters.
     
  9. brickfists

    brickfists The Nonpareil Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    8,666
    Likes Received:
    7
    yeah im surprised by the wba this is disgraceful and eve more surprised by the wbo they didnt sanction khav/barrera yet
     
  10. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    8,859
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think it's actually a good decision by the WBA. Hopefully it's the first step towards them scrapping the 'super champ' policy altogether.
     
  11. somerset

    somerset Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,254
    Likes Received:
    4
    Romanov should get a shot. He is easily the best in Europe - yet blantantly avoided by everyone the other side of the Atlantic.
     
  12. elgrancampeon

    elgrancampeon Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,413
    Likes Received:
    0
    This kind of **** is going on in all divisions... Not only that but have you seen Women boxing? It's a ****ing joke! I enjoy the fights but the alphabet soups are even worse there! This one girl lost her last 3 title fights(which were her last 3 fights) and was fighting for ANOTHER title!!!
     
  13. onepunch.net

    onepunch.net Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Even though I feel there shouldnt be any vacant IBF title fight that doesnt involve Funeka, the IBF is actually following the rules in going down the rankings to the 2 highest available contenders.

    The WBA is just making it up as they go along. "Super" champions are indeed "regular" WBA champions that have picked up another belt from the WBC, WBO, or IBF (they do not recognize Ring or the IBO). There has NEVER been a fight before for a vacant "super" champion before. It's laughable.

    And fyi to the other poster, the IBF and WBO sanctioning fees were paid for Campbell-Funeka. Nate did not pay a sanction fee to the WBA, because he had vacated it already. But Kushner paid one to the WBA so if Funeka won he would get the WBA belt too.
     
  14. PattyG

    PattyG Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yo Terry, is it true that Nate was Marquez's 1st choice before he fought Diaz? I read a story somewhere that GBP called you and wanted to work the fight but with Nates BK it was impossible. Something about not wanting DKP involved? I dont know if this is true but i did read it somewhere.
     
  15. Damo1712

    Damo1712 Boss Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,280
    Likes Received:
    0
    angulo is lmw and he won, unless there is a lightweight angulo? do you mean casamayor or diaz, who lost their last fights?

    I agree with you on the bull**** politics by the wba tho