hopkins owned by merchant

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by faisal, Feb 21, 2009.


  1. I think Hopkins put down Merchant there, rather than the other way round.
     
  2. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Both kinda owned eachother,Hopkins gave as good as he took really.
     
  3. Killer Instinct

    Killer Instinct Be formless, shapeless... Full Member

    2,290
    0
    Sep 2, 2008
    I posted this weeks ago. :hi:
     
  4. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    I havent watched the video but wasnt this after the Morrad Hakkar fight? Merchant was insensed that Hopkins defended his title against this guy who somehow was the mandatory for one of his belts. To be fair Hopkins did the right thing by not allowing the title to be splinttered. But Merchant gave him hell because he thought the fight was a disgrace. To be honest i sided with Hopkins here as Merchant was being nothing more than an anal old fool.
     
  5. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
    "Lemme tell you somethin' Larry...You get paid for being on TV and doing not much."

    ****in' right. :yep
     
  6. itrymariti

    itrymariti CaƱas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
  7. Devintea

    Devintea Active Member Full Member

    1,248
    3
    Sep 27, 2008
    I think the title of this thread was invalid. Larry Merchant was humbled, confused and corrected by Bernard Hopkins. In no way was he winning this battle of words or minds. As a matter of fact, Larry's comments were directed towards the sanctioning bodies.
     
  8. jeffradka

    jeffradka Active Member Full Member

    820
    0
    Jul 12, 2007
    Hopkins burned Merchants drunk ass.
     
  9. Godfather

    Godfather I put the G in God Full Member

    407
    2
    Jun 10, 2008
    Id say it was pretty even. And i do agree with Merchant that it is embarassing for a big middleweight to be calling out light middleweights that were previously welterweights and below
     
  10. CottoDaBodykill

    CottoDaBodykill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,735
    15
    Apr 6, 2008
    the guy lands 200 power punches and he wasn't doing much??? it's hops fault hakkar can take a shot?
     
  11. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007
    I'm not a huge Hopkins fan so I'm fairly objective here. Hopkins explanations were completely valid, as if Larry didn't know that allready. If the fight was such a travesty, why the hell did Larry show up, instead he could have staged a rally or boycott outside the arena. He didn't because it was "mandatory" for Larry to work Hopkins mandatory fight. What a Dick:patsch:patsch:-(
     
  12. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Larry Merchant can be a condescending ***** sometimes, this was an example of that.
     
  13. K0NPHL1C7

    K0NPHL1C7 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,624
    0
    Jun 15, 2006
    This was as close to being "owned in the ring" that Bernard Hopkins has ever come.

    That being said, Hopkins' rebut was decent.
     
  14. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Hopkins ****ing scorched Merchant's condescending ass. Bernard was 100% right. The only point Merchant made was in reference to calling out JMWs. Hopkins is smart as a whip. No wonder he's such a brilliant tactical fighter.