PAVLIK vs. ABRAHAM pushed back yet again, most likely off

Eastman: Perrenial contender. Well past his best when AA fought him. Miranda sparked him in 7, and Duddy beat him a bit later.

Jantuah: Former welterweight, lost to Ouma at 154 two fights before he took Arthur the distance,

Ikeke: Decent contender, lost to Anthony Hanshaw, beat Echols, and then lost to Arthur when they fought for the IBF title Taylor vacated.

Marquez: Old, Former titlist at 154, fought a draw with McKart, beat Lorenzo, lost to Arthur.

Gevor? I watched Gevor/Abraham on you tube. He's nothin' special.

 

But hands down these are the two best MWs that are out there so the damn fight has to happen to find out who is the real champ at 160.

 

FAIL again. We already know who the real champ is. Clearly KP.

 

No I don't, care to explain?

 

@boo:

Besides Taylor (and I give Kelly big credit for the two fights) I can do the same with Pavliks opposition

 

Exactly! A bunch of C-/D Level dudes at best.

 

Not easily at all...I agree

 

LOCKETT RUBIO AND FUTURE HALL OF FAMER DUDDY A maybe A-:good:rofl

 

Fail on your side. We don´t know it as log as four belts are in the hands of three boxers. And thinking that Sturm will never ever fight with Kelly or Arthur that is the only fight that matters.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl I set you up with for the 3 punch combo and you fell for it! :rofl:rofl

 

Taylor is the only one who is a step up in comparison to AA's opposition.

 

I am telling you man, I thought Mayweather fans were hard headed, no compromise or debate just name calling, and when the arguement part fails they defensive, sick bunch mateatsch

 

If you didn't know, I've been giving Team Pavlik hell for fighting guys like Rubio & Rocket Lockett

 

Your incorrect. Taylor vacated the two belts Kelly does not own, and we all know who beat who.