Pavlik was exposed by Hopkins

Just because a boxer loses a fight it is no reason to stake them.

 

Hell yes he was. His weaknesses were exposed, and those weaknesses lost him the fight.
Weaknesses:

Defense - His defense is bad, all he knows how to do is put his gloves up.
Footwork - Bad. Needs way more training.
Lateral Movement - Horrible. Needs some serious help.
Ring Intelligence - Hopkins is way to intellignet in the ring.
Trainer - Lowe can only take him so far. Something needs to change.

All of his weaknesses were used against him. He was definetely schooled & exposed.

 

People should have known that Pavlik lacked skills and had no defense, it was nothing new for people that understand what they see rather than just fall for hype.

 

Well no **** sherlock! Of course all of his flaws were exposed in that fight versus Hops. It doesn't man he can't improve though.

 

Yeah, yeah, yeah, keep talking your **** buddy, only reason you do is because he knocked your boy Taylor cold. :yep

 

This isn't a "Has/Will Kelly Pavlik improve after the Hopkins fight?" thread

 

"Everybody says Kelly Pavlik hit hard, he hit hard. So what he hit hard, I hit hard too."

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

I wouldn't say that. You give him a trainer like Mayweather SR., he'll definetely make Pav look better. Give him Roach or E Stew, they'll make him look better.

 

I dont like the word exposed but Pavlik was in the Hopkins fight and for all the reasons you listed.

 

iagree also and im a pavlik fan'