Joe Cortez : I allowed Marquez to continue...

What's worse, a ******* or a Biasedbarreraballlicker?

 

That statement doesn't make sense brother.

Yeah he allowed JMM to continuie because the 3 KD rules is not in effect . . . and JMM was not really hurt. He was depending himself and throwing punches . . . in short that's the right decission in that moment. At that instant . . . he doesn't have time to consider what's the nationality of the downed fighter . . . so if Joe Cortez was saying that to prove he is a friend of mexicans fighters . . . he ****ED himself up.

 

you look ****ing gay in that avy barrera ball licker!

 

Ungrateful Marquez, pac was sure grateful to padilla though LMAo

 

And if you read it backwards, do you find out who killed JFK?

Cortez is simply so crappy as a referee that he has to make excuses when he does something right. What's the big Scooby-Doo mystery here?

 

so is answered cortez a politically correct, it would not have vindicated pac of a win?

i think you're jumping from issue to issue here bro.
in your first post, you clearly said that cortez' admittance vindicated pac of a win, which was, as you contested by a lot of us here.

i seriously do not care about cortez so you can flame him all day long but would you please admit that nothing cortez has ever said or will ever say vindicate pac?

admit it and we'll put this issue to rest.

 

Actually, he's saying if he were an enemy he would of stopped it, but hes not bias so he let the fight go on, rightfully so.

If he was friendly toward mexican fighters he would of penalized pac for hitting marquez while he was trying hold himself up on the ropes. (Would of been cheap but you get my point)

 

Cortez never stated that he let him continue while feeling he felt he should have stopped the fight. There was no three knock down rule, so there is nothing stating that the ref has to stop the fight after three knock downs. In this case, the referee's job is to let the fighter continue if he feels the fighter is fit to continue. Obviously, Joe Cortez felt Marquez responded appropriately and was able to continue without putting his health at risk. How could Cortez have possible known that Marquez would come back to draw even after those three knockdowns? What evidence was there that would have given him that impression to let his "buddy" continue?
Do you believe Cortez felt Marquez was able to continue? If you don't, and if you say Cortez insinuated that he is friends with Mexicans and that is the main reason why he let him continue, then what friend would let his buddy continue fighting if his friend's health was at risk? It doesn't make any sense, and your allegations don't make any sense, because they are fabricated.

 

I think Cortez is inconsistent and injects himself into fights too much.

He's had a great career - But in general refereeing in our sport sucks and is just choked out from being effective with too much politics and BS back door schmoozing allowing referees to be apointed on their personal standing with various orgainisations rather than being subject to performance review and accountability.

 

Why would you post an article and then ask people not to direct questions towards you? Mad cowardice.

Saying you aren't an an enemy of someone doesn't mean you are their friend either.

Of course he had the option to stop the fight and made a judgment call. It seems to me you're getting on his case for admitting that he made a judgment call. He could've seen the last knockdown as the final straw and stopped it, but being in the ring he saw that he wasn't hurt and made the decision to let him continue. What he is saying is that if he was an enemy of mexican fighters he would've used the 3rd knockdown as a pretext to stop the fight, but didn't. Very simple. Your making a big deal about nothing.