How does Audley's early record compare to Lennox

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by colinthfc, Feb 25, 2009.


  1. colinthfc

    colinthfc Guest

    We rightly give Audley stick, but the critics came in early in Audley's career. Was this fair when Lennox's early record was compared (see below).

    I saw Lennox's debut at the Royal Albert Hall I blink and you missed it. I think Dominic Negus was tougher than most of Lennox's early opponents

    After he won the European title he started to be matched properly but before then his opponents were a joke

    Mike Acey
    Ossie Ocasio
    Dan Murphy
    Jorge Dascola
    Michael Simwelu
    Calvin Jones
    Noel Quarless
    Greg Gorrell
    Melvin Epps
    Steve Garber
    Andrew Gerrard
    Bruce Johnson
    Al Malcolm


    Brian Nix
    Lisandro Ezequiel Díaz
    Quinn Navarre
    Matthew Ellis
    Ratko Draskovic
    Rob Calloway
    Shawn Robinson
    Wade Lewis
    Dominic Negus
    Mark Krence
    Julius Long
    Piotr Jurczyk
    Derek McCafferty
    Mike Middleton
     
  2. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    is this some sort of sick joke?

    In 27 fights Audley has lost 4 times, one to a taxi driver. he has won no domestic titles, only had 2 fights against world ranked opponents, both of which he lost. hes never fought for a world title. it took him 8 years to get to this high point of his career. 17 of audleys wins came by K0

    in 27 fights, which lewis did in 5 years, lewis had lost one, in the 3rd defence of his wbc world heavyweight title. he won 26 of those 27 fights, won a world title, won the commonwelth, european and british titles, and beat his main domestic rival. 25 of his 26 win came by KO.
     
  3. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    yid army yid army. SPURS ARE ON THERE WAY TO WEMBLEY......TOTTENHAMS GONNA DO IT AGAIN
     
  4. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    I think a key difference was activity. Lennox was very active in the first year or two of his career: he fought a lot of easy opponents, but was doing so at a rapid rate. People were as much complaining about Fraudley's inactivity (especially at his age) than they were about his opposition. The two also combined in the end: facing Richel Hersisia, Julius Francis and Tomasz Bonin in a series is very good in the first or second year of one's career, but those were the fights Fraudley had in his FOURTH year of boxing.

    I'll admit it, though: when I saw Harrison handle Quinn Navarre and Richel Hersisia as he did, I was very impressed. Those were some gruesome combinations he used to dust them off. However, I was in my mid-teens, and didn't realise that being 21-0 means very little other than that you've found 21 people who can't beat you.
     
  5. davidjay

    davidjay Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,499
    1,168
    Feb 23, 2009
    The main thing is that Lennox always looked the real deal. I remember thinking even in his debut that he looked better than Frank Bruno when Frank had been a pro for years. Audley never looked like he'd be anything other than found out sooner rather than later.
     
  6. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,351
    3
    Nov 4, 2007
    I think the big difference is the fact that one was good the other was shite.
     
  7. noonan

    noonan Guest

    You cant really compare the two!!!!

    i hope lennox doesnt read this forum!! if i were him id be a bit pissed off!! one of the best heavyweights of his generation being compared to boredley!!! lol
     
  8. colinthfc

    colinthfc Guest

    I am not suggesting that you compare the 2 career by career. The point I am making was that they were both Olympic champions who fought similar type opposition early in their careers, but the public turned off Audley very early. And Audley never got over that negative perception and hence his performance followed.

    What was the better fight to watch - Audley v Richel Hersisia, or Lennox v Jean Chanet. I accept the Audley fight was for a crap title, and Lennox was fighting for the European, but what was the most exciting?

    PS - I am not suggesting in anyway Harrison was better than Lewis
     
  9. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,177
    Oct 22, 2006

    How bad was Audley? Well the fight you saw, saw Lennox flatten the reigning Midlands Champion inside two rounds on his debut; Audley did not fight Julius Francis (the first former Area Heavyweight Champion, he fought) until his 16th bout, and even then he laboured to a points win.

    Lewis was matched well on the way up, having many learning fights against experienced foes who gave him rounds and helped him develop.

    Within 18 months of turning pro Lennox Lewis was European Champion, within 22 months he was beating 35-0 top ten rated Heavyweights.

    Two years into his career Audley was not even fighting 10 rounders....
     
  10. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    H2H Audley KO inside one minute.... What a pointless/irrelevant thread.
     
  11. kostya by ko

    kostya by ko Boxing Addict

    5,859
    4,801
    Feb 18, 2005
    I agree. If he fights again when is he going to do it ? If he leaves it 6 months he may as well just quit now.
     
  12. Steve Fox

    Steve Fox Guest

    Ossie Ocasio, Noel Corless, Calvin Jones and Al Malcolm were good opponents considering where Lewis was in his career when he fought them.
     
  13. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    One thing that is often overlooked is that Lennox possessed a key component in his arsenal which Audley never had and never will have...........one of these heart thingies:

    This content is protected
     
  14. Steve Fox

    Steve Fox Guest

    Lennox had a full compliment of champion's offal - heart, guts, stomach and balls.