A wee change from the usual all time lists, who have been the ten best boxers since you were born? I was born in 89 (hence the name), so my 10 would probably be: 1. Pernell Whitaker 2. Roy Jones Jr 3. Floyd Mayweather Jr 4. Bernard Hopkins 5. Tito Trinidad 6. Manny 7. Lennox Lewis 8. Barrera 9. Morales 10. Calzaghe Guys like SRL were still fighting when i was born but were way past their best and therefore i can't include him.
1. Roberto Duran 2. Sugar Ray Leonard 3. Pernell Whitaker 4. Tommy Hearns 5. Marvin Hagler 6. Roy Jones Jnr 7. Mike Tyson 8. Lennox Lewis 9. Julio Cesar Chavez 10. Evander Holyfield Born in '76.
**** sake Stone Rose, you were only born 13 years before me yet your list ****'s all over mine. Why couldn't the fab 4 have been around in the 90's instead of the stupid ****ing 80's!
Sugar Ray Leonard Muhammad Ali Thomas Hearns Marvin Hagler Larry Holmes Julio Cesar Chavez Pernell Whitaker Evander Holyfield Roy Jones Mike Tyson
i was born in 58 so can have sugar ray robinson as my no1 2 is ali the rest is made up of hagler leonard hearns duran monzon chavez mayweather pacquiao but in no particular because its too hard to pick and im not that sure...............
Will answer this when my last breath is drawing close.... my life has many good years to endure... hopefully.
born 1993 and only started following boxing hardcore in 2008 so here i go 1. Mayweather Jr 2. Roy Jones Jr 3. Hopkins 4. Morales 5. Barrera 6. Pacquiao 7. Marquez (JMM) 8. Tsyu 9. Holyfield 10. Calzaghe
Does it have to be P4P? Can't I just brainstorm? **** it, I'm going to anyway. Barrera, Morales, Pacquiao, Mosley, Mayweather, Jones Jr, Bernard Hopkins, Juan Manuel Marquez, Oscar De La Hoya.
Exactly 20. If we're only counting fighters who have been active since after I was born, I'd have to take a couple names off. I guess I'll go ahead and remove Whitaker, Chavez, Holyfield and Tyson.
You can almost tell how old people are from their lists without them saying their age. If Mayweather is in there they are young, if Leonard and Hearns are in there they are in their 40s- etc. Shows you how subjective boxing is. I still think the Leonard/Hearns era is much better and more exciting than the Delahoya/Mayweather era.
i was close but you could still keep whittaker, chavez, tyson, holyfield because they did fight after 1989 but the bulk was after 89 execpt holyfeild who arugably achieved more after 89