Jacks Dempsey ranking - arguments

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by jaffay, Feb 26, 2009.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,845
    29,293
    Jun 2, 2006
    Excellent post !
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    Head movement with a low guard isn't enough at the elite level, especially as a fight progresses and you tire head movement won't get the job done.

    And he isn't that hard to tag coming in, look at primitive Firpo putting him out of the ropes and Tunney tagged him coming in all night
     
  3. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,935
    Feb 21, 2009
    A prime Jack Dempsey belongs among the top 10 heavyweights of all time, on any serious list. That's my opinion, based on watching many of his fights, studying his record, opponents, etc. Others are entitled to their opinions, of course.

    I met him once, long after his boxing days were over. I talked with him for a few minutes, shook hands with him, looked him in the eye, and instantly liked him! I had time to ask him one question: "Where did that famous killer instinct come from, Jack?" He answered with a smile: "Fear! I was afraid of most of those guys!" I enjoyed speaking with him, wish it could have been longer.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,845
    29,293
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tunney is on record as stating Dempsey was extremely hard to tag on the chin.
     
  5. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    :****off
     
  6. punchy

    punchy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,801
    10
    Oct 10, 2005
    Was that beating Sam with a Banana.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,405
    48,801
    Mar 21, 2007

    Well that depends, broadly, upon what you are trying to achieve. Low guard works just fine for Jack, and would continue to do so at elite level.
     
  8. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,655
    9,735
    Jul 15, 2008
    Dempsey remains the hardest to place ... in many ways he might be the most overated ever ... I love him but I just don't know ... he ducked Wills, he was highly inactive and if his last two fights v.s. Tunney were 15 rounders he might have been stopped in both ... too hard top rate for me but he remains a legend ...
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,405
    48,801
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think Marciano is the tougest to place, personally.
     
  10. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    It is unusual, but Tunney was an unusual fighter. Dempsey didn't just lose the title to an Ex-light heavyweight, he lost it to Gene Tunney, and pretty much everyone thought Tunney looked better at heavyweight than light-heavyweight.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,405
    48,801
    Mar 21, 2007

    Did they? I really did not know that. Was this the sportswriters of the time you are talking about?
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,271
    13,300
    Jan 4, 2008
    Monzon wasn't a top HW. And, yeah, I think Dempsey could have made a fight with whoever he wanted.
     
  13. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    That's called being respectful to the guy you just beat the living crap out of. He hit Dempsey so often that he had to be guided out of the ring after a mere 10 rounds! What about that knockdown, landing flush on his chin?
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,845
    29,293
    Jun 2, 2006
    No , Tunney stated it several times in print , in the 1st fight Tunney nailed Dempsey with a right hand in the 1st round ,it landed high on Dempsey's left cheek,the only time he really connected with Dempsey's jaw was with the left hook that put Dempsey down ,momentarily in the 8th round.Dempsey was guided out of the ring because his eyes were swollen shut nothing wrong with his jaw. A mere 10 rounds? I suggest you watch those 10 rds Dempsey took a hiding.
     
  15. flamengo

    flamengo Coool as a Cucumber. Full Member

    10,718
    8
    Aug 4, 2008
    What actually transpired with Tunney, in the 18 months prior to Dempsey I???

    Tunney battled a 10 rounder.. ND with Greb, inwhich Greb was only trying to survive in, then managed 3 ko wins, one against Tommy Gibbons... albeit, over the hill.

    In this period, Dempsey must have been extremerly confident.. and no doubt witnessed several of Tunneys bouts. The inactivity of Jack, post Tommy Gibbons, has to be ridiculed when looking at his defeat by Tunney.

    Tunney had a great record of activity prior to meeting Dempsey.. and inactivity as champion, as Dempsey did.

    I guess the time was perfect for Tunney to assume the mantle of H/W champ...

    The two bouts have created a huge element of interest.. The dynamite Dempsey being de-throwned by a smaller Tunney..
    The long count..
    The quality (effectively) L/HW record of Tunney...
    ..and the nature of the crowds, financial returns from the bouts.

    I cant help but feel, Dempsey deserved both losses, and Tunney deserves little Champion honours, due to the lack of defences over the Championship period.

    Sometime luck prevails... 'LUCK .... when preparation meets oportunity'..

    IMO, Tunney is the greatest LH/W to claim the heavyweight title.. and as Champ, has a poor record. The p4p standing are difficult tp place Tunney in, regardless of beating a rusty Dempsey twice.... over 10 rounds..

    Tuneys record is second to few, as was his boxing class of the day.. but as champion, his legitimacy has to be mediocre. Harsh to say... Dempsey was a shell of himself, prime for the pickings.. Heeney was less than brilliant.

    I wonder how a young Sharkey may have went, assuming a match was made instead of Heeney.?? Just a shame Dempsey closed to road for a potential Tunney/Sharkey match up.