Where Do You Rank Adamek in your Personal P4p List?

Beating Enzo Mac, Cunningham in a rematch or the WBA champ (can't recall his name? Guillermo Jones? Or have I just made that up? lol) would push him into 10th place. Only my opinion though.

 

Adamek is much, much better than Linares. He has a genuine resume whereas Linares only has a shot Larios. Cme on Asero, surely you don't count Linares as a 'two-weight world champ'???? I think you might dislike Adamek because you're a fan of Dawson.


Jermain Taylor?!?!?!?!?!?

Good that you've got Hatton in there. He doesn't get enough credit IMO.

 

And JuanMa over Vic??? I prefer Lopez to Darchinyan, but Vic has a much better resume, is just as hard a hitter P4P, and although he has lost, has rebounded in spectacular style. Adamek has done a similar thing and is way, way below Vic. What's the deal Asero?

 

atschatschatsch

 

Higher than Dawson.:good

 

But who has Linares beaten???? No one.

 

As much as I like Dawson, you do have a point. Adamek just recently moved up and has been very successful. He has achieved more than all the current CW's. Even though Dawson defeated him in the past, Adamek is neck to neck with Dawson. If some see him Adamek higher than Dawson, I have no prob with that.

 

that's my reasoning too. they are both close to cracking the top 10.

honestly Asero, Gamboa has beaten better opposition than Linares, Hell, Nicky Cook's win over Alex Arthur is better than anything Linares has done. You're being blinded by the fact he has won ABC titles in two divisions.

By the way, I'm not suggesting Nicky Cook belongs even in the top 100 P4P at the moment

 

oh yeah, i remember now asero, you have strange ways of doing P4P lists.

I personally think Gamboa could clean out 126 and 130. Does that mean that I should rank him in the top 10 P4P??? No, it doesn't.

 

Thanks. And what the hell has Linares done lately?

 

I think Abraham would beat Pavlik. But Pavlik has beaten better competition and done more thus far, which means he should be ranked higher.

Let me put this simply for you Asero. If you put a P4P list in terms of perception, by that reasoning, anyone who favours Hatton in the Pac fight should have Hatton at no.1 in the P4P list. See what I mean, this way of reasoning is flawed, it doesn't work.





Before anyone flames me, I think Pac will beat Hatton, just using a stupid example to show Asero his way of compiling a P4P list is flawed.