Rendall Munroe v Kiko Martinez - thoughts !

Are you refering to me!

 

You talk a lot of ****.

Munroe beat Martinez, Dunne didn't. Infact Dunne was embarrassed. You are a bitter Irishman.

 

I was and I apologise. No need for me to write that. Got a little pissed off that Scunthorpe eaqualised. :-(

 

I speak the truth, why would I be bitter, Dunne is on his way to fighting for a world title! I know who I would rather be.
Apart from that defeat to Kiko, which was a learning curve not an embarrassment, Dunne hasn't put a foot wrong.
Just because you Munroe fans do not agree with me does not make my points any less valid!
Why do you guys have to resort to insults? In my experience when people do not have a valid argument, they start name calling.

 

I didn't name call you. I said you talk ****, which you do, that is my opinion on your posts not you as a person. You also come across as very bitter and biased, when we look at your location its not a surprise.

I simply point out obvious facts. You like to talk about Munroe, and how good Dunne is. I simply tell you Dunne got sparked out inside one round by this supposedly poor fighter as you put it. It's a pathetic attempt to discredit Munroe when your boy got knocked out in a round by this guy...what gives!

 

Dunne has not put a foot wrong against very limited opposition and has looked hardly better than domestic standard against lower tear Euro level guys.

 

I simply believe that Dunne is the better boxer! I assure you I am neither bitter or biased, Example, I like Paul Hyland, another Irish boxer, but think he is in over his head against Napa.
The whole Kiko sparked Dunne argument holds no weight with me, by your logic, any boxer who beats Martinez is better than Dunne!
Anyway, we should agree to disagree!

 

He has looked more impressive than Munroe who has had worse opponents.
I have nothing against Munroe but he 'aint that hot.

 

I am not even talking in respect to a fight between Dunne and Munroe, I don't even have a strong opinion on that fight as yet.

Your point that Munroe supposedly struggled with such a poor fighter like Martinez was absolutely laughable yet deplorable as a fan of Dunne. Can you not see how that looks?

Just give it up and give credit where credit is due. It would be like a Khan fan discrediting the guy that beats Prescott! :yep

 

Munroe should wait and fight the winner of Cordoba - Dunne or go for the WBC crown (Nishioka) although he may have to travel to Japan for that

 

Martinez is better than Dunne. This does not mean that Munroe is better than Dunne but Munroe has certainly got Martinez number by beating him twice. Dunne needs to rematch Martinez otherwise he will just be the 'Irish guy who avoids big punchers' AND the guy 'who is worse than Kiko Martinez the average Spaniard.

 

Ok fair play to Munroe but I still think Dunne has the beating of him.

 

Dunne has faced one ok opponent and he lost. BAD. Since the comeback he has faced more very limited opponents. Do not let wind and **** cross your judgement.


Munroe is an ok British level fighter who is fortunate that his division is pretty poor in Europe and home otherwise he would still be contending English titles and looking for a British crack.

 

I cannot even argue with that twisted logic! Martinez is better than Dunne!!! Like I said, fair play to Munroe but come on! So any fighter that ko's the other guy is better, I could give you countless examples of why this is flawed logic.

 

Erm yes. Twisted logic? Why? So you believe that the loses of a fight is the best man?

OK. I always knew Amir Khan was the real deal. :happy

Naz was **** until he lost to Barrera.