JMM IS P4P no. 1

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by enzo, Feb 28, 2009.


  1. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i have no problem with jmm as 1b. great fighter! had a strong case of being greater than barrera and morales especially with one more big win.
     
  2. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,772
    23,635
    Feb 19, 2007
    after jmm vs pac 1 i said these were two very evenly matched fighters and i now have them tied for number 1 p4p just like i had them tied after their first fight.
    i think the weight of their combined last four fights evens them out. even though dlh didnt show up, it was still a huge challenge pre fight and pac did what he said he was going to do. as far as jmm, he has challenged two bonified threats to anyone at this weight and stopped them both. im just happy to witness firsthand their little race for glory.
     
  3. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    this is not amateur boxing. if jmm wants to win vs. pac, he has to avoid being KD'd. close fights are decided by KDs. fights between pac and jmm will always be close given that they are the top two fighters in boxing as it should be.
     
  4. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006

    :twisted:
     
  5. ceebz

    ceebz Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,462
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    Indeed. I was laughing at Max' intro to the fight. "I thought JMM won more rounds." Well, maybe he should learn to stay off his ****ing ass. :lol:

    The other thing I found hilarious, was, Max making light of pac's wins over Diaz and ODH, but, touting JMM's win over a 37 year-old Casamayor.

    OK, Max. :yep
     
  6. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Marquez beat Pac two times and Pac is still running from him now.
     
  7. retriever

    retriever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,057
    29
    Jan 20, 2006
  8. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,772
    23,635
    Feb 19, 2007
    no they are not. it was close BECAUSE of the knock downs, without them it would have been a schooling in the first fight and a win for jmm in the second.
     
  9. huggerfree

    huggerfree Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,702
    0
    Feb 12, 2009

    yes of the lightweight, nate would bveat him tough. imho
     
  10. ceebz

    ceebz Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,462
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    Maybe the should outlaw knockdowns.... Since they don't count as much. :patsch
     
  11. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,772
    23,635
    Feb 19, 2007
    what the hell does that even mean? did you understand what i said at all?
     
  12. ceebz

    ceebz Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,462
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    Maybe not... it was hard to decipher... with all of the tears... :lol:
     
  13. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    if he beats pac twice, why does he still wants a 3rd fight?
     
  14. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
    good... :good

    they just want revenge :yep
     
  15. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006

    :lol:

    he wants $$$