Is beating Juan Diaz reason enough for a boxer to be crowned P4P #1?

clinic??? 4-4 going to that round... naayyyy.

jmm is having a hard time against class b fighters. pac obliterates them.

and diaz was campbells leftover. LOL

 

I didn't agree with Harold's scorecard during the fight. After round 4, JMM figured out how to beat Juan Diaz and slowly broke down the baby bull. I had the fight 5 rounds to 3 JMM. He was slowing down Diaz while maintaining the high and accurate punch output. At 35, he was able to keep up a hyper pace while landing flush accurate punches.

If you weren't amazed with that performance, there's something wrong with you or you just don't like JMM.

 

jmm is a formidable foe and if you ask any pac fan jmm is pacs kryptonite.

he is inching close to pac but no way witht that performance he is number one. it was not a dominating fashion, juan is not a pound per pound guy and juan was a victim of campblell's talent. when you put all of these things then jmm fell short.

it was a good win but it doesnt constitute any overtaking of pac's status. but yours is respected and you have your say. thats just my opinion.

 

Nate is a great fighter and a credit to the sport...but, I didn't see Nate "ruin" the baby bull in that Championship fight. I had Juan winning every round before he got cut. That was the difference in the fight. He wasn't getting absolutely schooled like this fight. Again the only rounds that were truly dominated by juan Diaz in last Saturdays fight was 1 and 2. After that, JMM started to work the body and land the uppercut, slowing juan's pace and accuracy considerably. That's why he got the KO. He dominated Juan...no one has ever done that to Juan Diaz...not even Nate.

If Nate had achieved the KO, i would agree with you.

 

Are you joking, or are you just from Houston, TX?

 

Exactly.
Can someone tell that to Hatton too...

 

This should be non debatable.. Pac definitly keeps his #1 spot

 

That is a stretch to say beating those guys makes JMM best p4p #1.. Big stretch.

 

Marquez is #2 in my book...If he had beat Pac he'd be #1 but he didn't..He's #2..

 

Just out of curiousity.........

.....had the official judges have JMM the winner, you're saying you'd have JMM at #1 regardless of who you felt won the fight?

 

Yes...I mean if he woulda won that fight he woulda been #1 IMO after Floyd retired....When they went into that fight PAC WAS #2 AND JMM WAS #3 IN THE WORLD (MAYBE #4 CUZ JOE C WAS STILL FIGHTING AND I DONT REMEMBER HOW THEY HAD IT)..WITH THE VICTORY OVER PAC I WOULDA HAD HIM #2 AND PAC #3 OR 4....MAYWEATHER THAN RETIRED SO I'D PLACE MY #2 WHO IS PAC (WOULDA BEEN JMM IF HE HAD BEAT PAC) AT #1..:hi:

 

:good
nate owns J diaz :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

It makes absolutely no sense that a boxing fan who is knowleadgeable can let what are by history, corrupt judges dicatate to them who should rate higher?

You're telling me that it should'nt matter what the individual fan may have seen or felt a certain fight to go one way of the other.....
For example, I saw JMM beat Pacquiao 9 rounds to 3......but I or anyone who had that score in favor of JMM should disregard that and let official judges (who everyone can agree can and will be corrupt) dictate to us who we should have at the top????

Excuse me, but I have to step out and have a good laugh.....:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

:deal