Is beating Juan Diaz reason enough for a boxer to be crowned P4P #1?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sprika2, Mar 2, 2009.


  1. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    THAT IS UR OPINION!! MY OPINION IS THE FIGHT WAS 6-6 WITH PAC WINNING CUZ OF THE LONE KNOCKDOWN...MAYBE ANOTHER FAN HAD IT 9-3 IN FAVOR OF PAC...THE FACT IS THAT THE JUDGES DECIDE WHO WINS THESE FIGHTS...GO LAUGH ALL U WANT....

    WHEN A REFEREE MAKES A PASS INTERFERENCE CALL IN THE NFL THAT PUTS THE OTHER TEAM WHO IS 5 POINTS DOWN AT THE 1 YARD LINE WITH 30 SECONDS LEFT (AND IT CLEARLY IS A BAD CALL) AND THE OTHER TEAM SCORES DOES THAT MEAN THAT THAT TEAM DOESN'T GET THE VICTORY..???:deal

    IN ANY SPORT THERE ARE BAD CALLS THAT COST ANY FIGHTER/TEAM THE GAME...

    AGAIN I HAD IT 6-6 WITH THE KNOCKDOWN..U HAD IT 9-3 FOR JMM...SOMEONE ELSE HAD IT 9-3 FOR PAC...THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT MATTER ARE THE JUDGES..

    NOW LET ME GO LAUGH REAL QUICK CUZ U JUSS BEEN EMBARASSED!!:bbb:rofl
     
  2. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    You must be a ******* because I'm seeing right now that reading comprehension is'nt your strongsuit......

    I did'nt ask you who you thought won.......on your previous post you had insinuated or even said that Pac should be p4p because he officially won.....

    I asked you if JMM had been given the decision and not Pac, would you rate JMM higher, and you said you would.....
    Right now you rate Pac higher because he was officially given the decision......had JMM been officially given the decision, you'd rate JMM higher.....you're letting judges who by history been known to be corrupt, inflluence how you rate fighters.



    The only person who should be embarrased here is you, for letting judges influence to you who you should rate higher....

    I'm not letting an official scoring decision dictate to me where I place a fighter, when I have clear vision and can judge for myself......
    ......you however are letting baffoons who are manipulated politically within the boxing landscape, dictate to you who should have a bigger standing within a division and boxing legacywise as a whole.

    Feel free to be embarrassed!

    .....as a boxing fan, not one single boxing official dictates to me how I see and score a fight, or how I should rate a fighter based on their scoring......
    We as fans see the fights for ourselves, we should know how to appreciate and what standing to give said fighters based on what we as fans see, not what they as official and politically influenced judges see.
     
  3. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008

    defeating drandpa's nate leftover made jmm number 1?? :nut:nut:nut
    didnt jmm had a hard time with the juan diaz?? LOL
     
  4. sprika2

    sprika2 Active Member Full Member

    1,211
    0
    Apr 28, 2006
    :tired
     
  5. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    here goes divac again, branding another poster who doesn't agree with him a *******. tsk..sad tale of his life really..:-(
     
  6. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Exactly!
    ....anything that makes sense becomes :patsch:tiredto a *******!:yep
     
  7. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    in a forum, each of us is entitled to our own opinion. If an opinion of a poster doesn't fit with your own and if that breaks your heart, i suggest that you just leave the thread and find a new one instead..
     
  8. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    see how stupid you can get.. admission is bliss after all.:yep
     
  9. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Beware, anytime a poster does'nt debate the specific points of a thread, and puts down a well written post with a :tiredor :patsch or :rofl and the such.....you're pretty much setting yourself and begging to be labeled as such!
     
  10. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    You'll find that I dont label people *******s just because they dont agree with me.
    Those that do take on the points of the thread topic and debate logically having something of substance to add to the thread I can respect even though I might not agree with them.
     
  11. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    and when the hell did i use an emoticon to insult or play sarcasm with you?.. im just stating facts the way i see it and that's my opinion.

    if a fellow poster doesn't agree with my views, i'l RESPECT it and let him be. but i also remain vigilant to pacify if need be.
     
  12. huggerfree

    huggerfree Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,702
    0
    Feb 12, 2009
    Those he think so are idiots in boxing and idiots in life.
     
  13. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    I seldom engage in stupid debates and you know that. I only post when I feel that discussions go beyond the borders of reasonableness and respect..
     
  14. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    No he has to beat the p4p #1 before he can become # 1 until than he's at number 2 !!
     
  15. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    and coying posters as "*******S" would qualify as an insult in my book.. You're supposed to be a good poster divac, so i suggest that you don't resort to name-calling..

    After all, nobody calls you a PACTERON right?