Which was the more impressive run: Liston 1958-1963 or Tyson 1986-1988?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, Aug 9, 2008.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,508
    Jan 4, 2008
    Liston raced through the division during these years, crushing Bethea, De John, Williams, Valdes and Folley and ending the run with a double demolition job on Patterson. Machen was the only one to present him with any difficulties during this time period.

    Tyson destroyed Berbick, Thomas, Biggs, Tubbs and Holmes, topping it by taking out Spinks in 90 seconds. He was taken the distance by Tucker and Smith, but never given any real problems.

    Which run was the most impressive do you think?
     
  2. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    102
    Jun 30, 2008
    It's a close call, but I give it to Liston. Folley, Williams, Valdez, and Machen are all higher level of fighters than any one on Tyson's run (excluding Holmes and Spinks, but both were past it there). I rate Liston's one round demolitions of Patterson higher than Tyson's one round demolition of Spinks for two reasons: One, Patterson did some good work after these blow outs, beat a couple of world class guys, and while outclassed again and punished, probably did better against prime Ali than he did against Sonny, where as Spinks retired for good after Tyson. And Two, Spinks looked scared shitless when he was face to face with Tyson. Anyone who looks like that a few seconds before a fight isn't going to last long. Patterson was never afraid of Sonny, proven by his futile but brave efforts to beat Liston in a rematch.
     
  3. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,364
    1,031
    Sep 5, 2004
    I give the edge to Tyson. Tyson's run was so dramatic and dominant that he remained a relevant figure at the top of the Heavyweight division for more than a decade after that run during the 80s. Additionally, I believe that the fighters he beat during that time period were better than Liston's comp.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,953
    45,844
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's very very close. Max Baer should be factored in here too.
     
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,508
    Jan 4, 2008
    Ok. Let's hear a case for Max Baer.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,953
    45,844
    Mar 21, 2007
    His run between September of 1931 and June of 1934 bore no losses and saw him lift the HW title. He destroyed Max Schmeling by knockout and Primo Carnera went the same way. He debunked the myth that he was vulnerable in a decision winning fights on points over 10 and 20 rounds.

    In all, there were 14 wins over good opposition.

    Max had taken life in the ring and was seen as an enormous puncher. He was almost impervious to punishment at this point himself, his destruction at the hands of Louis still ahead of him. He was perfectly capable of rendering an opponent unconcsious with one punch, like these other two men, and did so against Earnie Schaff.

    Interestingly, what happened to Liston appeared to happen to Max - once he came to the title he took his foot of the gas a bit.
     
  7. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    73
    Nov 20, 2006
    Liston, not by a great deal, but I think his was marginally the more impressive overall. the cobra summed it up excellently.
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    So your giving Liston a 5years period against a Tyson 2year period? I actually think Tyson's is better, which is high acclaim. I think Spinks and Patterson are comparable. But Holmes and Thomas are probably better than any Liston win. And Berbick and Tucker are up there
     
  9. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    275
    Oct 4, 2005
    Liston never fought the #2 (not counting himself) heavyweight during that period, Johansson, whereas Tyson literally ran out of opponents. And he did it in just 3 years, whereas Liston did it in 6. So, i'd go with Tyson on this account.
     
  10. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    16
    Jun 24, 2007
    Liston ducked Johanson?
     
  11. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    16
    Jun 24, 2007
    1958-1963 Liston 21 fights
    1986-1988 Tyson 20 fights

    No ****ing way!
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,508
    Jan 4, 2008
    I think Witherspoon can be seen as big an omission as Johansson. He never reached the same heights but he stayed near the top longer.
     
  13. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    275
    Oct 4, 2005
    He did not fight him.

    Witherspoon was knocked out in the first round in '86, right when Tyson came up, and did not score any significant victory any time afterwards during Tyson's reign. During 86-88, he was not anywhere close to how highly Johansson was regarded during 58-63.
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,508
    Jan 4, 2008
    He was on the other hand KO'd twice by a guy that Liston KO'd twice.
     
  15. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,456
    12,859
    Apr 1, 2007
    Suzie?!?! :lol: