No Calzaghe Hopkins rematch!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by ninebar, Mar 7, 2009.


  1. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    No one can convince themself that Hopkins wouldn't do the same the second time round. Just like Hopkins fighting the same old **** when he fought Taylor the second time. When Hopkins looks better i.e. Pavlik it is because of the opponent not because he has decided to fight differently. In the rematch Calzaghe would still be all over him and should Hopkins fight differently i.e. engage more, that would simply do better for Joe!
     
  2. Gaz S

    Gaz S Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,766
    0
    Aug 20, 2005
    Except Hopkins would land more punches this time (effectively) and Calzaghe would still mostly be bashing away at thin air, hands and elbows...
     
  3. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    There's another Gaz on the forum!

    After the first few rounds of the Hopkins fight I was thinking '****! Joe is out of his depth here, he's not on Hopkins level'. But then he turned it round and won by a point on my card IIRC.
     
  4. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Every time you punch, you become open. It is a risk v reward situation. The more X punches, the more he is open to one of Calzaghes slaps.
     
  5. Gaz S

    Gaz S Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,766
    0
    Aug 20, 2005
    That is very true. However I believe Hopkins is of a better class, and Joe isn't really accurate and neither does he pick his shots. He just flurries and hopes. Hopkins wouldn't get caught by much of any note (i.e clean, effective and hurtful punches).
    This, in relation to what he would land on Joe, would swing it in his favour as he starts to hurt Joe and bust him up.
     
  6. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    Thats your credibility all gone in one sentence.

    Nobody 'flurries and hopes' their way to 46-0, unifying his division, 2 weight ring champion and beating a lot of top class opposition on the way.

    He beat Bernard Hopkins end of story get over it. Hopkins deserved **** all from that fight, his antics on the night and afterwards was a disgrace.
     
  7. Gaz S

    Gaz S Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,766
    0
    Aug 20, 2005
    Maybe you need to watch a lot of Calzaghe's fights more closely, even in slow motion if you have to, and compare the amount of punches that actually land with the legal, scoring part of the glove on a legal, scoring part of the opponent's body compared to the ones that don't......
     
  8. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    I'd be quite happy if Calzaghe didn't fight again. There are much bigger and better fights out there for Hopkins.
     
  9. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    maybe you should be a little less nieve gaz, dont you think it would have been picked up and investigated by now if their was thought of cheating, besides the fact if he was merely slapping he would have surely been beaten by now as lacy has laid claim he slaps hard
     
  10. Guy

    Guy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,597
    0
    Dec 15, 2008

    Are there?? :huh

    Keep looking Hopkins....
     
  11. Guy

    Guy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,597
    0
    Dec 15, 2008
    This content is protected
    ..:nut

    3;Avatar of Joe getting clipped

    4;A total of 8 Posts, all of them slating Calzaghe......

    = +1 For the 'I hate Joe Calzaghe' Club :verysad
     
  12. Gaz S

    Gaz S Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,766
    0
    Aug 20, 2005

    1. Accuracy is a term relevant to output. You throw enough ****, some's bound to stick.

    2. Fantasy? I must have imagined Joe getting knocked square on his arse then.

    3. Yeah, and it's a hell of a "clipping" wouldn't you say!

    4. Thanks for reading! :thumbsup

    = hell, I'm the damn PRESIDENT of the club ,son! :D
     
  13. debaser

    debaser Active Member Full Member

    1,110
    0
    May 4, 2008
    Can't believe we're still on about this. I know there are some real Calzaghe haters on here but surely as fans of the sport they can analyse the two fighters for what they are. The fact is Hopkins would not beat Calzaghe in a month of Sundays. The reason is because he is a fighter who does not throw a lot of punches and looks to open up his opponents and land effective counter punches. He clearly was not able to do this against Calzaghe, the first two rounds aside, and resorted to cringeable spoiling tactics. The result of this was that he effectively managed to stop Joe from landing meaningful shots and led some to deem the fight as close. However, crucially, he landed nothing of note himself. This combined with the cheating, spoiling tactics, added the fact that he spent the entire fight on the backfoot meant that the verdict could only go one way.
     
  14. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Kawazaki did! Any half decent fighter can succeed if matched so uncompetitively

    Look at Peter McNeely, Lou Savarese, Nadeem Siddique, Adnan Amar, Brian Nielson, Eric Jakubowski etc

    Half of them couldn't fight their way out of a can.

    Put a talented fighter in with flawed opposition, what happens?
     
  15. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    Many feel Hopkins already has beaten Calzaghe.