Yes and Hamed's is underrated, all the top fighters at 126 including a 3weight champ, beat all the belt holders - WBC/WBA/IBF/WBO, the top 122lb titlist of 7years in Bungu who was more proven than MAB at that time, a 118lb titlist
John Conteh ( Hand & Management Troubles surfaced ) Esteban De Jusus ( If it wasnt for Mr Duran...?) Harold "Shadow" Knight ( Great Fight with Rocky Lockridge then had to retire with Eye trouble )
Walter McGowan is a lesser obvious one whom many of you will barely have heard of. Yes he was a world champion, but he suffered horrendously throughout his career on cuts. If his face wasn't so easily shredded, he could have been ranked up alongside Benny Lynch as one of the greatest fly's there has been in my opinion. He was an absolute fantastic amatuer as well. He never fell short due to skill or heart thats for sure.
Superb bantamweight, he very much ranks up there with some of the best boxers that ever lived not to win a world championshiip.:good
I don't really think he fell short. I think he did pretty much all that he could've in his career and was indeed a great fighter.
Tyson is already a Great and a lower top 10 ATG though he could have been better had he kept his dedication. Tyson physically is perhaps the most complete HW ever other then height he had everything.
Collin's problem was a lack of world level talent. He's actually a fighter who maximized what he did have.
I rate Barrera's victory over Hamed as one of the most satisfying master performances of all time...pity it wasn't for 15 rounds, like in the old days. In the the ring that night there was one atg, and it wasn't Hamed.