Did Haye duck Wlad by not agreeing to terms?

This sounds weaselish. "The terms were agreed to verbally"...??? What they heck do you even mean by saying that lol...!!!???:huh Can't the Wlad and Vitali fan in some of you guys quit for a sec, and reason to us what you're saying???:nut

 

I'm pretty sure Haye would not be offered peanuts. Even in today's economy Wlad can probably command a cool 10 million to fight, and even if it's 75-25, Haye will still get over 3 million. Granted he has to pay his team, but I'm pretty sure he'd scrape by.

 

What has this got to do with the price of tea in China lol...:nut

 

What did Haye's camp say?:huh

 

All that talking and stalking, and he ends up walking?

I just don't get Haye. If he's so confident in his chances at beating Klitschko, getting the most prestigious belt in boxing and securing all the financial opportunities that go with it, it sure makes me wonder if he truly is all that confident in his chances.

The way the heavyweight fight scene is today Haye could be looking from the outside for another year. Maybe that's what he's thinking. Let Klitschko get a little older, maybe get a little beat up, or even get upset by someone else and then go for the belt.

 

I think Hayes people were going after ridiculous amounts knowing this could be there biggest and probably last pay day

 

I'm not being funny but to quote a wise man "You don't have to have been a horse to be a jockey"...

Frank Warren never stepped into the ring, nor did Don King for example...

Are you saying that because you've stepped into the ring we should getting you to negoiate the Haye vs Wlad deal????

Wlad, if you're reading this we might have a soloution! :happy

 

Until we hear from both sides, we will never know the truth.

 

No, I'm saying that I've been at the negotiating table, and I know how these things go.

 

Don't think...............know!

 

Yeah your right i really dont think Haye would beat Wlad .... if they fought 10 times he would win maybe once from a lucky bomb

 

haha, brilliant, coming from the head wlad cheerleader himself.

how dare i try to bring a little sense to this thread.

you see what we have here is nothing but hot air from both sides and that fat **** dan raphael. it would seem that it's perfectly ok to hang, draw and quarter david haye based off, well not much at all, wlad and his team saying haye has been a naughty boy. anything though that comes out shedding doubt on wlad and his teams actions during the negotiations is quickly struck down with cries of..

SHOW ME PROOF!!!! I REFUSE TO BELIEVE!!

newsflash ****os, not one of us has a single shred of proof or evidence. it's all a bunch of bull**** posturing until something credible is released with regards to this whole circus, then you can play the blame game.

 

Fair enough but you should say that in the first place. Otherwise you'll end up sounding like one of those pricks in the pub who slags off everyone's opinions about football because they played at non-league level for a few years....

Being a boxer might give you a better insight to a few things but it does not make your opinion any more valid than a well thought out and well presented one made by someone who has only watched from an armchair.

 

They haven't even fought yet lol. I could say the same thing in Haye's favor...until it happens, say what you want. Just don't assume a man is ducking another fighter like a few others have. Not saying you did, but using the word "duck" when conversing about two proud fighters is assinine to me.

 

That's all that needs to be said. :good