Is beating Juan Diaz reason enough for a boxer to be crowned P4P #1?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sprika2, Mar 2, 2009.


  1. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008


    It was an excellent performance indeed by the maestro!:good Rightfully, he deserves everyone's recognition as the best P4P fighter except that the guy at the top did equally well if not better in his last two fights so Pac remains P4P#1.:lol:
     
  2. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Will Pac get by Hatton?
     
  3. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    You're kidding, right? No current boxer from 126 to 140 lbs can outscore JMM like that, not even Chris John nor his daddy, Manny Pacquiao!:lol:
     
  4. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    So, are you saying that you can never be wrong that others who see differently from yours must be corrupt?:-( I know some people really have such mentality and they are really honest!
     
  5. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    May I co-sign this?:lol:
     
  6. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    I understand Divac. He honestly believe he can never be wrong. Some people are really like that!:lol::lol::lol:
     
  7. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    I'm still new here, may I ask what's a PACTERON? Don't worry, I will not call him such, whatever that means.:good
     
  8. Suge Green

    Suge Green Boxing Junkie banned

    7,678
    3
    Sep 15, 2006
    In answer to the question...Hell no.
     
  9. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007

    Co sign!

    Here's Divac's golden Rules:

    1) Judges are corrupt if Divac does not like the results but judges are not incompetent and not corrupt if Divac likes the results.

    2) The Ring Magazine has it's biased opinions and agenda but for the sake of arguement PAC retires afte the fight with Hatton wether he wins or losses and Ring Magazine puts JMM at the #1 p4p!

    Everything changes! All of a sudden Ring Magazine is not biased and does not have any agenda at all

    3) JMM is the most techinacally gifter boxer, counter puncher, intelligent, best defense etc... boxer in the last decade or so..but IRONICALLY everytime JMM meets PAC. JMM ass kisses the canvass!:lol:

    4) Who has a better resume? NEXT QUESTION PLEASE! It's a very sensitive topic among top JMM fans they don't want to talk about it!

    5) Lastly, JMM never never never never never never really LOST a single professional fight! DAMN! f**CK the judges!

    But if the judges have the same score cards with JMM! Hey! Hey! Mr Judges you are doing fine. Lets have some coffee!!!!:hi:

    Simple question JMM fans.. SINCE when was a WIN OVER Mr Juan Diaz the Barometer to be the #1?! He was already exposed by Nate, right?!
    We already KNOW how good Juan diaz is. So why all of a sudden JMM should become #1?:hat:huh
     
  10. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    It is more impresive than beating an "old" weight drained De La Hoya, but the answer is no.
     
  11. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Thats not what I'm saying.....I'm saying that every boxing fan should rate fighters by how they and not the judges see them......

    I certainly would'nt want to read an article who's rating fighters stricltly by browsing over boxrec.com.......

    The person rating the fighters should have at least seen a fair amount of his fights, and absolutely have seen his defining fights.....

    .....what the poster who I had a disagreement with earlier was saying was that we should abide and rate fighters according to official results.......
    Thats ridiculous, and I'm not just talking about the JMM-Pac fights....boxing is one of those sports where everyone involved knows is politically run.....

    .....all I'm saying is that as an observer, if you want to honestly rate fighters, you cant go by official results......you go by what you've seen for yourself!
     
  12. HyperBone

    HyperBone Silverback Gorilla Full Member

    7,152
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    pac is an overrated bum. :good

    dumb boxing 'fans' will always argue that ****
     
  13. rapidHOOK

    rapidHOOK The Champ is HERE Full Member

    3,658
    0
    Aug 31, 2008
    what is all this BULLSH*T thread about jmm is no.2 until he beat pac in a third fight or pac loses to hatton

    why make such a fuss

    it just gives the pac tards a chance to shout out

    the pac tards are right though pac is no.1 without a doubt
     
  14. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    kalunya5964,

    Bottom line for divac..
    Like I said If divac does not like the results. Officials are corrupt/incompetent/organizers have politial agenda..

    Just like all the LOSSES of JMM! Divac actually believes all those losses are not caused by JMM being the actual loser, it is because of the reasons I mentioned.

    On the other hand, if they like the scoring of the judges they'll even say they have the same scorecards as the judges :lol: but if they don't F**CK those judges :!:.. they are again corrupt/incompetent..

    it's that simple...
     
  15. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Fortunately, I believe Kalunya is smart enough to judge a poster by what and how he posts......so ultimately he'll find out soon enough that its you Silver who's making a fool of himself!