Video: Calzaghe/Hopkins..lol.Can you really be the loser after this?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jeff M, Mar 12, 2009.


  1. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008
    How did you score it and give me what rounds you gave to Bhop.

    That goes to everyone else on this thread except San(Think we have done this before, but if im wrong give out your score bud).
     
  2. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004


    I think most astute observers felt B-Hop was faking it especially after watching the replay and the 5 minute rest was for his lungs, Joes gloves did not land near B-Hops balls
     
  3. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    3 low blows by Calzaghe= one point deduction
     
  4. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008
    The people I am talking to are online so if you could at least post how you scored the first 4 rounds and your final tally of points it would be appreciated.

    Jeff M, Cuban, Kush and the rest of the OMG i cant believe the judges(And majority of fans) saw it for Calzaghe brigade could help me i would be gratefull.
     
  5. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008

    You are here.

    How did you score the fight, especially the first 4 rounds and your final total please
     
  6. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,494
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    If you mean me amongst others, i'll do it tommorow if you really want.

    It's one in the morning UK time and I'm not going to watch the fight again so I can score it again just now.

    I've watched it a few times and usually scored it 115-12 to Calzaghe, but I don't recall which specific rounds.
     
  7. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    First 4 rounds= Hopkins 40-35
    Hopkins 114-113
     
  8. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008
    Wasnt meaning you.

    Same time for me bud.


    Im assuming you mean for Calzaghe and that was the first score i came to aswell. I'm assuming you gave the 10th to Calzaghe. I did to the first time but even though Hops bad sportsmanship left a bad taste in my mouth I cant give that round to Calzaghe.

    114-113 for calzaghe the 4 times ive watched it sober. The first, live, I had it 115-112 for Calzaghe
     
  9. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008
    I agree.

    So you saw Calzaghe win 6 of the last 8 rounds, and still ***** like a ****in **** about slapping, and how he was **** in that fight and the judges gave him ONE more.


    Next.
     
  10. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008
    So the biggest Troll who cant get his head around the Calzaghe win has given Calzaghe 6 of the 12 rounds from his own scorecard. A known Hater.

    Who Nex!!
     
  11. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    Actually should be 114-112 for B-hop. Calzaghe should have lost a point for 3 low-blows.

    115-112 and 116-111 for Calzaghe is robbery.

    112 for Calzaghe is the most favorable score he should get. I could have easily scored more rounds for B-hop but no more for Calslappy. Joe lost.

    Calzaghe ducking a rematch for such a close fight is disgraceful. Look at his face as the decision is announced. He thought he'd lost.
     
  12. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008

    The Backtracking ***** Express just left.

    You missed it. Better luck next time.

    As for the face remark, I'll bite. He looked like a fighter that had just been in a close fight with the best fighter he had ever faced and was relieved he got the decision he thought he deserved(And the majority agrees), Just like Hop looked like a fighter who thought he had done enough to win and was dissapointed that he didnt get the nod.

    It was a ****in close fight. What do you expect.?

    Doesnt mean you can start threads about the quality of 1 mans work and act like someone has shat on your Christmas tree and robbed you off the only joy in your world then proceed to give that same man 6 ****in rounds(Half if you cant keep up) of the very same fight.


    Yor only mission was to troll. You succeded. Hop didnt. Deal with it.
     
  13. p.Townend

    p.Townend Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,400
    4
    Jan 14, 2009
    He has been at years,he did it against Kessler as well.As soon as he realised Kessler was a danger and had come to fight he resorted to the thousand slap per round tactic.Safe in the knowladge that the judges would love every second and the baised commentry on tv would convince the casual fan that it was classic boxing from a master.Hopkins should have got that decision but as the rounds went by it became clear that the master of the 12 round bore was about to strike again.The only fighters i can remember Calzaghe hurting durin his time as champ were Pudwill,shieka and Manfreado,hardly impressive is it.Im sure somebody will come up with another name or 2,but my lasting memory of Calzaghe is the night he fought on the Tyson undercard against Starie in Manchester,i paid good money for that ticket and the fight was one of the worst ive ever seen.Most of his fights have been similar in my opinion.
     
  14. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    Yep, pretty much always a slap fest. If Kessler gets out of the mess with his promoter he will have a far better career. I'm a little surprised he did not KO Calzaghe. He'll be the best SMW in history against a division that is actually strong, not the completely weak one Calzaghe brags about "ruling". Kessler missed 3 weeks sparring before the fight. Maybe had his timing affected.
     
  15. Triplesod

    Triplesod Drunk& pissed up on booze Full Member

    2,270
    0
    Jun 23, 2007
    So. You find a Hopkins highlight video and using that as proof, you suggest the decision should have gone Bernard's way?

    It doesn't work like that, mate.

    They call them "highlight" videos for a reason, because they are the high points, or, best bits. Give me ten minutes and I'll put together a video which, using your philosophy, proves, without a shadow of a doubt, that Prince Naz absolutely leathered, exposed and embarrassed Marco Antonio Barrera!

    I have noticed you a lot, since you joined up. It's very hard not to notice you, actually due to your number of posts and their ingredients. You really stand out as a ****ing dope, y'know?