Just saw Marquez - Diaz fight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PATSYS, Mar 3, 2009.


  1. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007

    I'm confused! When the two meet two times. JMM's ass kissed the canvass 4 TIMES and now you are putting JMM ahead of PAC?! While PAC's kissing the canvass against JMM remains a dream for JMM and his fans!!!
     
  2. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    You're twisting the story my friend, It's a draw (by scoring error) and a win in favor of Pac. Obviously, you didn't know that JMM had fought more old and past prime fighters than Pac! Juan Diaz is young but not the hungry lion that you're teeling us, He's a B-level fighter like David Diaz. Juan Diaz is relentless like a bull but has little pop in his hands, Pac would stop him earlier.
     
  3. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    PAc and JMM are pretty even as fighters. However lately Pac has taken the road of less resistance. The Hatton fight i believe is a pretty easy fight for PAc. Hatton hasnt impressed me much his whole career and a quick powerful guy like Pac should KO him.
     
  4. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    NO! Marquez is the better executioner of old and past prime fighters! I believe Pac is not even number 2 on this matter!:lol::lol::lol:
     
  5. rreed23

    rreed23 aka Gordon Gekko Full Member

    1,874
    0
    Nov 23, 2007
    He did get owned for the first 6 -7 rounds
     
  6. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    :rofl:rofl:rofl

    And the *******s ask to be taken seriously.
     
  7. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    least RESISTANCE!!!!?!

    Better check with JMM's mouthpieace aka Divac IF he believe's JMM's resume is supperior to that of PAC.

    :hat
     
  8. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    how can it be "least resistance" when one of pac's last 3 fights was with jmm himself and all of these 3 fights that pac won were in 3 diff. weight classes. that's why these last 3 fights gave pac the 2008 FOTY award, his second after also getting the 2006 FOTY.
     
  9. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    Yeah, like an ostrich JMM fans are the ones ignoring the fact that JMM has fought more old and past prime fighters than Pac. JMM has 7 while Pac has only 4 including MAB and JMM himself in the rematches. JMM is certainly way way better than Pac when it comes to beating old and past prime fighters.:yep:yep:yep
     
  10. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    And you ask the *******s to take you twisted story seriously? :patsch
     
  11. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    That same Diaz could not even stop the superslow Juico?:huh Nah, that Diaz will fold earlier than David vs Pac.:yep:yep
     
  12. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    Yeah, Pac's fantastic but he's no Marquez! JMM theoretically is a much better fighter but he failed to prove that in the ring with Pacman after two tries!:yep:yep:yep
     
  13. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    Juan Diaz would stop David Diaz late after winning every ****ing round against him. ****, Julio Diaz is better than David, true story.:yep
     
  14. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    OK don't take the *******s seriously but prove to us that JMM didn't fight more old and past prime fighters than Pac.:hey:hey:hey
     
  15. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    That your opinion, not yet proven in the ring! You want us to take that seriously?:huh