pwede kaayo do. morales is a fighter thru and thru. he will go down but he will go down fighting. dili mahadlok except kung tulion siguro,.
not the best weight for morales. never koed a foe in this weight. so its a fight on skills vs skills/power. later wins w/c is moneymay
Take it from Morales no1 fan (me, most probably)..... Mayweather by decision. A more valid question might be... who was better ?... Morales at 122 or Mayweather at 130 ?
Morales was only `beat-up` past his best & worn out vs Pac... Barrera never gave Morales anymore of a beating than he took in return. Nobody `beat-up` Morales in his prime, thats an insult to who the man was & what he was about to say such things.
Mayweather never lost at that weight and probably only lost a couple of rounds there,he was trully dominant at 130.while Erik who was also great at 122 lost to Barrera(in the eyes of the majority of people) and had some trouble with Zaragoza and McCullough. had they faced each other Morales would win by KO in the first round
Far too much for Floyd??? You are kidding right? Saddler as tough as he was, was easy to hit. Floyd would be too defensive for Saddler. I agree that Saddler's tactics wouldn't be allowed today. Saddler did have a chin, but he would be fighting a man his size who could also punch to the head and body. That is the type of fight floyd loves. Packs up shop...lol. Cleverly said I guess...lol.
He, you got to admit, this wasn't funny lol... that is top of the line grade A boxing knowledge at the highest level in this forum...I'm talking about the underlined lol. And they say I'm hard on Pac lol.