Margarito Investigation Concluded...according to official

no, does everyone who convicts margo is automatically associated with p4p as a pedo?:huh

don't tell me you're gonna give me a bad name here by labeling me a pedophile as well?:rofl lol stick to the topic bozo, that question of yours came out from nowhere and i was like atsch

 

If you've ever defended P4Pdabest....well...I hate to tell you...

 

anyway, im trying to have a good discussion here you can quote me on the 1st thing i said on this page and you won't see any hate comin from me. At least freddy is keeping it cool when discussing with others

 

I'm guessing Bazooka thought you were defending p4pdabest. You missed quite the drama. atsch

 

did i then? cause i didn't and i don't regularly post here if you would check the intervals and dates of my post. At least what I do is stick to the discussion not attack other posters

 

I don't know, did you? Relax dude... Was just explaining that he may have thought you did.

 

Yeah i checked that thread, but didn't really know whats up about it. It got closed already, and i really don't know p4p at all so i have no affiliation or reason or so to defend. You can check my join date to see i've just joined recently, I am a fan of boxing and floyd

 

yeah i'm cool with you, its not cool though when someone suddenly jumps out in the open and labels you a pedo. Pedos are the worsest scums of the earth and if I found one, I will beat and probably kill instead of bringing him to justice

 

S'all good.:thumbsup

 

Get in line...:hey

 

Freddy-Wak....you aren't even bordering on objectivity anymore....you are sort of going out of your way to stretch it...

The top official there stated that there was an illegal substance found in the hand wraps and Margie's license was revoked for a year.


"that tells me they went by what other people were saying..."[/quote]

Looks like you are trying to read too much defense for Margie into it...

You can call the CSAC dishonest or incompetent, but clearly they found
an illegal substance....if that is not good enough for you because they won't disclose to the public the specifics....then you can always file litigation for full public disclosure of the findings.

Its starting to sound like Margie's camp is ok with the non-disclosure.

 

atsch completely misses the point.....

 

like always...
it's all good though bro, every man for himself...

 

There should be a reading aptitude test before guys can post.

 

Help me out Lance if I missed something....