What makes a truly great fighter ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by smiff, Mar 22, 2009.


  1. smiff

    smiff Member Full Member

    116
    1
    Mar 13, 2009
    Answers on a postcard please .
     
  2. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    834
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    Beating other great fighter. Period.
     
  3. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    834
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    "fighters" being plural
     
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    that doesn't really make sense. If beating a great fighter makes a great fighter, then what made the very first great fighter?


    in general it is considered that being one of the 100 best fighters of all time makes a great fighter.
     
  5. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    yeah i think we can close the thread there....any skill or attribute or size of an internal organ (heart) doesnt matter if you dont win and win against the best
     
  6. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    834
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    Well the first great fighter had the be the best fighter around beating other fighters that were considered legitimate contenders. After beating enough to build a legacy it would be safe to call him great. The next great fighter would have to beat him and do what the first great fighter did to secure his own legacy. But even if you have speed, power, timing, tight defense, good footwork, it wouldnt make you great if you couldn't beat elite fighters. For example people like Mark Breland or more recently Zab Judah.
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    yea but if someone beats all the good fighters easily, then doesn't that make him a great fighter? and if not then what does it make him?
     
  8. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    834
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    That's an age old question a lot of great fighters face. They don't have great fighters in their prime to face so they fight the best around and beat them, but the critics still question their greatness, like Mike Tyson or Larry Holmes. So I think you could still consider them great because they still fought the best around. But it would depend on the circumstances and longevity I suppose.
     
  9. fabo1988

    fabo1988 Active Member Full Member

    1,496
    1
    Jan 2, 2009
    i hope you mean a great fighter in their prime otherwise alfonso gomez is great because he beat gati
     
  10. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    834
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    Of course I do, although I wouldnt consider Gatti great neither.
     
  11. Capitan

    Capitan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,938
    55
    Jul 28, 2008

    Also beating them in their prime....thats why Gayweather will never be considered among the serious enthusiast as a great fighter.
     
  12. Capitan

    Capitan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,938
    55
    Jul 28, 2008



    Good job ....booradley....these two epitimize greatness....thats why I cringe when I hear nutsuckers refer to Gayweather as a great fighter.
     
  13. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    One . . . beating other great fighters.

    Two . . . the ability to come back after every loss and continue on to reach greater heights in his career.

    Three . . . having humilty in wins and defeats.
     
  14. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    resume and ability....i consider top 120 fighter an ATG would doubt...121-150 are borderline cases