Margarito should be banned for life!!!!!

Your definition of "neutral", is interesting to say the least. I'd probably say you have it confused with "belligerent" and "oblivious"

 

damn. i wonder how long he's been doing it. kind of puts his career into question.

 

Exactly. "Trainers admission". His trainer never admitted to plaster of Paris, only an innocent mistake. Margarito, on the other hand, was completely oblivious to all charges. The pictures of the evidence that was released, if anything, supported the notion that Margarito could have been unaware of seemingly normal looking gauze.

Freddy-Wak was never in the wrong, and should not have to answer to any of you.

 

I disagree with that. He's still looking for a way out for Margarito who is guilty as hell. The CSAC, the justice department...what more do you want?

 

**** man, your owning this thread :good

You show more intelligence than virtually everyone else combined. What a bunch of spiteful twisted haters.

 

Very bad for the sport of boxing.

 

you know eze, i've been back and forth with this just like many of us....but after a few weeks of really looking into it, it was easy to believe margo when he said he didnt know.....now, it makes it harder to believe him, that's all i'm saying...

and even with this, i'm still gonna be an evidence first type of guy....nothing has changed

 

Haters/ The man was a confirmed cheat.

If it would of turned out he was innocent.. thats different.

 

I understand. All I was saying is you were defending Margo even after.

I would probably defend Floyd if I was in your position.

But when Margo is hyped as the next coming of a Goliath, it's fun to **** on the guy when he goes down as cheating. I hope you understand.

 

You're attempting to twist this into something it never was. The main area of contention was whether or not there was anything illegal in margo's handwraps. Maybe you should reacquaint yourself with the threads in question. Whether Margo was complicit or not in the ordeal was a secondary discussion. But I like your bait and switch diversionary tactic.

 

Divac has not denied Margarito being guilty, as far as I know?

I don't see why this has to be treated as a weapon against other posters on the forum. Only now do any of us actually know what was in the wrapping, and anything before this article, was clearly speculation. Admittedly, some posters in particular had an agenda, but I think Freddy-Wak and Divac in particular had nothing to apologize for. They have been sensible throughout.

Let's stop condemning posters for having differing opinions.

 

He hasn't denied it but hes questioned the evidence because it didn't turn hard.

It's almost as if he's saying they didn't turn hard what are they banning him for?

 

Freddy Wak never denied whether or not there was something illegal in the gauze. I'm sure if you address him about that, he would tell you the same thing. The CSAC was guilty of handling the situation improperly from day one, but the handwrapping was clearly tainted.

However, Freddy-Wak was defending Margarito because depending on the extent to the irregularity with the gauze, there was a chance Margarito would have been unaware. His trainer said he had nothing to do with it, the pictures of the actual gauze seemed innocent enough and Antonio has always portrayed himself as an honest warrior. There were certainly reasons to believe Margarito.

The first person to turn around and say Margarito should be banned when it was confirmed what was in the wrapping? Freddy-Wak.

Lay off.

 

You're being overly dramatic. Nobody is condemning anybody. If someone puts an opinion out there that I don't agree with I'm going to challenge it as I'm sure many others would do the same to me. What do you expect? To just read his post without responding? If these posters don't want a response, then don't post your opinion in a public forum.