The winner of Holt/Bradley must face Devon Alexander or vacate their WBC belt

Mandated by WBC.Not a bad idea. I mean the winner of these two getting a shot at the winner of hatton/pac are slim to none so an Alexander fight is decent..

Alexander isn't on their level imo.. He's a tuneup..

Alexander/Ortiz is more like it..

Thoughts?

 

Alexander is with King. Go figure.

 

Well I don't see what makes Devon Alexander qualified? I like Alexander but he's only had 17 fights, his toughest opponent is Chop Chop Corley and in all actuality he MAY be a step backwards for Kendall Holt.

Still I guess if you win a great fight like this, You're entitled to a small breather.

 

Why? Guy should have had to win an eliminator first...

 

This makes Witter's promoter look worse than I actually fought he was. Usually when champion loses his belt he can make him self No.1 contender with two or less fights. I never heard of this guy but beating a faded/shot ex champ doesn't cut it with me.

 

Devon would **** Holt up but Bradley i dont know about that.

 

Who did Alexander beat recently to deserve this?

 

I thought Alexander was fighting Witter soon ?

 

So u wanna bet on the Holt/Bradley fight?

 

the same thing that Linares did to win the vacant WBA title,the same thing Ruiz does to constantly get title shots, he has a promoter that is used to deal with crooks.

 

what kind of bet?

 

I know that you're leaning towards Bradley so let's make a ban bet..

How long u wanna make it? u choose

 

I HATE to defend Ruiz but he gets title shots because he takes little pay, needs little to no time to be prepared and isn't scared to travel.

And I fail to see how Alexander ( a guy with little pop and decent ability overall) could **** up Holt. I think it'd look something like a souped up version of Holt/Hopkins.

 

a ban bet its not fair cause you have 10 aliases while i have none.

 

Got em :rofl:rofl