You make sound as if he is picking and chosing opponents and there is some greater challenge out there.Like LARRY HOLMES he is defeating everyone who is put in front of him.
Well Vitali is probably going to get in the Boxing Hall Of fame where Naseem Hamed (a fighter that beat nobody just like you claim Vitali did not and was exposed as a joke) never will.
Bull****. Perhaps the physical and mental bludgeoning that Vitali laid on Peter for 9 rounds had something to do with Peter's poor showing???
Actually if you look at this thread http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=94848 you will see a large percentage of ESB realized Peter was a fraud before he fought Vitali
Mate, couldn't give a **** about the HOF. Hamed has a better resume than Vitali Klitschko - there is no doubt about that, despite what you Think/Say/Claim.
Or the fact that Peter in came at a career high weight.Peter wasnt anything special but he was probably the most dangerous foe Vitali could fight.A solid HW champ with pretty good skill and good power.
No he doesn't. Hamed beat NOBODY in their prime or that was worth a crap period. When he stepped up he got embarrassed unlike Klitschko. Hamed is perhaps the most over hyped fighter of the last 20 years. He was a joke and a fraud.
Do you really want to go through this again? :huh You know the outcome already, Hamed's resume is clearly better than Vitali's.
AHAHAHA Hamed is the soft spot. You see how revisionist history works on so many fighters there Hoya-UK
Seriously bro, I'm very happy to get into Hamed's resume. I know what the common misconception is, and I enjoy educating people.
Hamed beat a total of 9 current, future of former world title holders. Including every title holder in the division at the time.