Whom do you prefer - Calzaghe or Froch?

Calzaghe.

 

Listen .....im developing a reputation of a Calzaghe hater. I am not!!!

I think Joe has been an excellent champion a Champion who threatened to be great but didnt.

His asthetically pleasing record is super at 1st gland but once you investigate his CV you realise he has only been fighting at the TOP level for 2 years.....Between Kessler (if you call Kessler Top level) and Hopkins.

For me that is very poor for a fighter who claims to be a world champion for 12 years....would we accpet that from Manny Pacman, De La Hoya Hopkins or Jones.


of course we wont.


Froch on the other hand is claiming to take on the best challenges.....taking on Taylor suggests he is genuine if he is consistant/succesfull vs this calibre for the next 3 years I will rate him higher than Joe.

 

From Newbridge,Wales.........Jooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooeeeeeeeee Calzaghheeeeeeeee

 

Eugh, neither!

But if I absolutely HAD to choose, Froch. Because in his 7th year as a pro he's fighting the likes of Taylor, while Calzaghe was fighting Sheika and Starie.

 

both.

 

i like them both, JC a little more

 

I Voted Cal but im not a fan of neither to be honest.

 

calzaghe by a mile...

 

no one cares what you think.

 

Calzaghe easy, Froch somehow always manages to mention Calzaghe in nearly every interview and needs to stop living off Joe's name, Taylor will punish Froch all night to win a wide UD.

 

froch.

 

calzaghe.

anyone sense a little inner turmoil?

 

Froch

Because Calzaghe went and retired before fighting the guy who has been chasing him for years :twisted:

Sven Ottke.

I mean, Glen Johnson

 

Not sure. I think I've heard of Calzaghe, but who's Froch?