Even if you love Dempsey, it is time for a generation to accept -

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Mar 28, 2009.


  1. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,259
    Feb 6, 2009
    a ballchinion then ??
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,366
    30,170
    Jun 2, 2006
    Sharkey was not going down from the low punches he looked at the ref and Dempsey hooked him and kod him,end of story
     
  3. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,259
    Feb 6, 2009
    defend yourself at all times
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,366
    30,170
    Jun 2, 2006
    Especially if the guy in there with you is Jack Dempsey!
     
  5. JimmyShimmy

    JimmyShimmy 1050 psi Full Member

    646
    11
    Jul 26, 2004
    So Basically, McGrain is wrong.

    Several people disagree and have posted numerous counter-arguments with objective reasoning.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,657
    51,449
    Mar 21, 2007

    The three main people that have presented counter-arguments are yourself, My2Sense and McVey.

    McVey is clear that his pick is based primarily upon head to head and altough he is interested in exploring some of the other issues, this is his primary reason for disagreeing. That's fine with me.

    There is nothing 'objective' about My2Sense's reasoning, nothing at all.

    That leaves your good self.

    Also, if you're trying to declare a winner based upon numbers of serious contributers who agree or disagree, it's a pretty even split, with Wills maybe coming of slightly better. Not bad considering the strangleholed Dempsey has upon Wills in terms of rankings, world over.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,965
    27,942
    Feb 15, 2006
    It is probably fair to say that Wills is the most consistently under rated heavyweight of the gloved era. Probably the first second and third most under rated.

    In recent years a long overdue reaction to this has set in led by historianmd such as Kevin Smith which is to be aplauded.

    However I get the idea that some of the most zealous Wills revisionists might have over corrected more than a little.
     
  8. JimmyShimmy

    JimmyShimmy 1050 psi Full Member

    646
    11
    Jul 26, 2004
    The theme is that Wills resume is far deeper, which is an overstatement.

    Ali compared against Terrell is far deeper.

    The truth of the matter is this:

    -The jewel in Wills crown is tainted for the fact not only was Langford past his best, but his condition was far from stellar, often coming in around 200lbs at that stage and being described as out of shape. Langford's best weight was very probably in the 170's.

    -Fans always go on about Willards shape against Dempsey when Langford wasn't the best either.

    -Dempsey owns more good wins. It's important that he fought guys like Miske, Brennan, Levinsky and Carpentier, and his victory over Sharkey is arguably better than any one of Wills when you consider that many thought that was Sharkey at his peak.

    There really is much that can be said of Dempsey in his defence when you're with the program like me.
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,965
    27,942
    Feb 15, 2006
    Interesting point.

    How would their best oponents stack up?

    Faded Langford vs prime Sharkey or prime Miske

    Faded McVea vs prime Gibbons

    Jeff Clark vs Georges Carpintier

    It is not clear that Wills has a qualatative as oposed to quantatative edge.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,657
    51,449
    Mar 21, 2007
    I'd say that Wills has a better resume than most of the guys on my top 15 list.

    I'd say that Dempsey has one of the worst.


    Firstly, Langford is a proven heavyweight.

    Second, Wills was a busy black fighter in a racist era dealing with the same issue that Langford did.

    Third, i've been through all of this with McVey. Check out post 108. These constant attempts to smear Wills dominance of Langford are unfortunate. Langford was a genuine threat doing great work in the HW division when Wills was beating, and i feel that's shown in the post. McVey, Dempsey's staunchest defender on the forum agreed with me, he said it was objetive analysis and he respected it.

    Maybe it is not the case with you, but far to many guys who want to defend Dempsey do so by first attacking Wills. It's a red light on this forum, and what it means is, "i know you are right and i am running interferance".

    If you have intelligence that indicates that Langford was in terrible shape every time Wills beat him in spite of the work Langford was doing elsewhere around the time Wills was beating him, post it.

    I'm not going to go through all these guys, but i'll take Wills' wins over Langford over these guys, stand alone frankly. Add McVey and Jeanette and things look wide to me. NONE of the guys you've mentioned come anywhere hear qualifying for my top 30 at HW. Carpantier? It was important to fight Caprantier? Is that a joke? That Dempsey matched Carpantier, a smaller white fighter, but found reasons NOT to match Greb is a joke.

    And this constant harping about Sharkey. My2Sense has tried to boil the argument down to their respective performances against him for goodness sake.

    Yes, Sharkey is a good scalp. I'd rate Langford and McVey as more impressive scalps when Wills beat them and I think that's self evident personally, I would also tend to add Jeanette when Wills beat him, although that is not as obvious.
     
  11. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    13,176
    20,529
    Jul 2, 2006
    i think Langford was going blind after his fight with fulton in 1917. I could be wrong but this is how i remember reading about it
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,657
    51,449
    Mar 21, 2007

    I have his serious troubles beginning after that fight too. He still has stoppage wins over great fighter though. Unreal.
     
  13. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,056
    Oct 25, 2006
    Been an excellent thread this. Man, I've missed this place.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,657
    51,449
    Mar 21, 2007
    Where you been FOF?
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,965
    27,942
    Feb 15, 2006
    Most sources suggest that Langford sustained his detatched retina in the Fulton fight but these things are hard to prove and sources can conflict.