Eubanks or Benns legacy?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Baby Bull, Mar 31, 2009.


  1. Baby Bull

    Baby Bull Active Member Full Member

    664
    0
    Mar 2, 2009
    Who has the better resume Nigel Benn or Chris Eubank and who will go down better in history?
     
  2. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Good question.... Eubank has the more impressive victories.... Benn the better names.
     
  3. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    Tough, but maybe Eubank' victory over Benn is the decisive factor.
     
  4. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    Benn got robbed in the 2nd fight :yep
     
  5. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    It all depends how highly you rated Watson in reality there's very little between them
     
  6. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    Just because I have Eubank in my avatar doesn't mean I disagree with you :lol: (I like both fighters just as much).

    If you give the 2nd to Benn, Eubank' victory in the first is the more impressive victory.
     
  7. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    :lol: To be honest I am more of a Benn fan.
     
  8. Mike_S

    Mike_S Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    171
    Nov 4, 2007
    I rate Watson very highly, probably the most technically sound boxer out of the 3. I rate Eubanks ability higher than Benn's but Benn goes down with the greater legacy for testing himself against the better competition abroad and seemingly more willingness to fight the best.
     
  9. Matt1986

    Matt1986 Member Full Member

    182
    0
    Mar 13, 2009
    Well said I love Eubank and what a chin that man had!! Benn and Eubank were made for each other in the ring and there personalities out of the ring too made the fights all the better. I am gutted that the fights were before my time but I have them on DVD.

    Now Watson I think was possibly the be better fighter out of the 3 just a shame it ended how it did for Michael. If you haven't read Watson's autobiography then do so its a really good honest read
     
  10. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    McClellan was overrated. Despite this, Benn should have the superior legacy. However, legacies lie. Despite the fact his legacy is only slightly superior to Eubank's, I deem him the FAR superior fighter.
     
  11. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Yes, it was a shame, and he was definitely the best out of the 3.
     
  12. firetrap01

    firetrap01 New Member Full Member

    20
    0
    Jun 18, 2008
    Watson the best boxer
    Benn the best fighter
    Eubank the best record over fights between the 3 of them
     
  13. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    delete..
     
  14. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    It's about the same, isn't it?

    It's hard to seperate them really.
     
  15. Mookhound

    Mookhound Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,610
    3
    Oct 11, 2008
    Benn, it has to be. His victories are far superior, and his loss against Eubank actually made him a far better fighter later on. He became a boxer-puncher rather than just a slugger.

    ask the Yanks: they'll have only one answer to this, which shows the impact Benn made in boxing's major country.