Who do you rate more highly: B-Hop, FMJ or Pac-Man?

All things considered (resume, H2H, achivements, legacy) who do you rate more highly out of Floyd Mayweather Jr., Bernard Hopkins and Manny Pacquiao?

 

B-Hop easily! 43/44 years of age and still a top ten pound for pound fighter! Unbelievable

 

Hopkins a notch over both Mayweather and Pacquiao.

 

Hopkins and it's not even close. If PacMan beats Hatton, Mayweather, Mosley, he'll obviously be the fighter of the decade, but unless he does that, it's hard to compete with the Tito schooling, DLH clean KO, Tarver schooling, Winky win, Pavlik schooling and debated losses to Taylor and Calzaghe with Adamek still a possibility. And that's only this decade. He also unified all 4 titles for the first time and dominated the MW division like a very few in history.

 

How would you split FMJ and Pac then, Thunder?

 

I would also say Hopkins. He has achieved a lot even in the face of his old age.

 

hopkins....legit top 30

 

B-Hop, then Pac, then Floyd.

 

That's not the question bro.

 

I think B-hop resume is a good one but if PAC win the 140lbs which he can and a win against Cotto or mosley at 147lb which he became 7 div champ hard to tell lets wait and see...

 

Hopkins and its not even remotely close.

 

B-Hop of course because he just wins with skill and smarts while some other shave speed and monster power or etc. B-Hop just out smarts and out thinks his opponents he uses every trick in the book.

Floyd and Paq are close because i think both have achieved a lot but i would go with floyd simply off H2H.

 

thats a damn good point....didnt even think about that till you brought it up.

 

Hopkins... I really don't like the guy, but I have huge respect for him as a fighter

 

Why should he be? :huh