Who Wins: JC Chavez or Manny Pacquiao?

thats why we have the judges , right red manure??

and many thought oscar would massacre pac, right red manure??? :good

 

Give me a break. Chavez has fought and beaten fighters that were better than Pac.

 

he fought good fighters and he had constipation with them.

pacquiao flushed good fighters..:good

 

Yeah, he really flushed JMM :roll:. Not to menton he lost to Morales.

 

jmm kissed the canvass 4 times and pacquiao should have won twice... morales won due to head butt :good after that, pacquiao flushed morales .:good

chavez got lucky on taylor fight. his ass was getting whooped. randall whooped him and KD him. pacquiao has no problem moving up so far.

 

And judges get it wrong sometimes, but you don't watch boxing so I guess you wouldn't know that. I'm saying it was robbery though, but most people feel he got the better of pac and at the very least, was on equal terms, at least H2H.

I don't know what many people at esb thought you dumb****, I wasn't on esb much last year. That doesn't even have **** to do with anything being discussed right now.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

You're so bias, it's like you don't even care anymore. :good

 

and as a ****** like you who kept on getting owned in this forum, would I expect more???

your crying doesnt work here... your boy kissed the canvass 4 times and held on that rope for dear life, would you expect a W from him in a close fight... NAYYYYY.
dont complain. now upgrade that GED education of yours.. seems you dont know that rules have to be applied in every fight. :good

 

and you are not bias?? :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Morales lost 5 of his last 6 fights. The only one he won was against Pac :deal. He lost to freakin Zahir Raheem! :rofl Pac gets limited credit for beating Morales. I was actually at the first JMM fight, and Pac should be ashamed to have let him come back like that. Earning a draw is not flushing someone. What Chavez did to Camacho, that's flushing someone.

 

I am some yes, but you better not be comparing me to you or you're full of ****. Honestly, no one this forum compares to you and there are lost of candidates.

 

Idiot, Marquez came back after being KO'd three times IN ONE FIGHT!!! He was down four ****ing points to start the ****ing fight! Pac only had to win like two or three rounds out of the 11 rounds! And some people still think he lost!

The second fight Marquez was KD'd once in a round he was winning easy. That hurt him, otherwise, there is no way if ****ing hell you could score that fight for pac. Still, most thought pac lost.

I mean **** man, how can you not agree that Marquez is at least on even terms with pac after watching all that with your own eyes.

 

geeeh. zahir was naturally bigger than morales.
and pac-em fight was close even though pacquiao had 1 eye, right??
Although pac had gets a small credit in whooping morales ass, he was the first one to put that ass on the ground and erased him in the map of boxing :good

putting someone on their ass 3 times is not shameful. especially if one judge admitted his mistake that 3 KD should be 10-6 :good

flushing is like pac flushing hoya, just like what hoya did to chavez :hi:

 

Both Hoya and Chavez were about 376 years old when they got whooped. Pac gets credit for that whooping but lets not act like that makes him a world beater. He has proven nothing at 140 and there is no evidence that he would have been able to beat the best 140 lber ever. Pac beating down Barerra is not the same as whooping Chavez. Chavez would be apply more pressure than Pac could ever imagine. Chavez tko in 9.

 

and the judge admitted his mistake that 3 KD's should be 10-6?? :roll:
of course pac won couple of rounds, only ray charles like you guys would have thought that pac earned only 2 to 3 rounds.

and going to second fight... thats bull**** if marquez was winning easy. pac sealed the deal on the 10th round thats why he relaxed a little bit..

and marquez should be counted for holding that rope. that should be another KD.