Hopkins:"I'm not a charity"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PolishPummler, Mar 31, 2009.


  1. Dorfmeister

    Dorfmeister Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,558
    6
    Aug 8, 2007
    I am not!

    It should never be a sin to lose to an american fighter and there's nothing wrong losing to a good, skilful, gutsy polish fighter. What I am saying is that if you call Chad slick and still expect to outslick or overwhelm Bernard, then it's not worth tryin. Believe me, I can feel it pretty clear, Hopkins is very tricky, smooth, rough and super-intelligent, Adamek would find himself in Pavlik's position, honest.

    Hopkins lost to a superb, primed and superfast RJJ in 1993 by 116-112 scores and lost two controversial fights to Jermain Taylor 115-113, 115-113, 112-116 ( and by UD 115-113), and dropped and lost a SD to JC. You can mention them but please don't compare prime RJJ, JT, JC with Thomas Adamek and I do respect Adamek, wish him luck actually.
     
  2. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    And none were as big or hit as hard as Adamek.JT won twice and he is nothing special but then again all of this has nothing to do with anything.

    If Adamek didnt put butts in seats and already make what has been offered he would be in no position to negotiate.He doesnt have a hard on for BHOP and doesnt NEED this fight.High risk low reward.Yeah the division doesnt have names but he can still consistantly pack houses fighting good oppositon and possibly unifying in Chicago NY or NJ.