Haye: "The Klitschko's Are Wussies"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by san rafael, Apr 5, 2009.


  1. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Haye is probably hyping the fight, although if he loses then he will be disgraced. He will have a hard time beating such a big guy in Vlad.
     
  2. ya-ni

    ya-ni Active Member Full Member

    936
    0
    Feb 28, 2009
    Haye's i guess feel's calling the brothers wussies, is his way of getting back at them for bending him over in negotiations, an not even bothering to use a lubricant,,,,,deep down i sure hayes really enjoyed it, an the beating that coming is just that much more exciting for hayes, they say his mom is english an his dad is jamacian, well after those negotiations, hayes new daddy is urkanine,,,,,
     
  3. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Is this the new standard now that ridiculous lowballing in negotiations is seen as a sign of machissmo?
     
  4. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Yes.
     
  5. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Haye's going to eat those words in the form of jabs & then he'll swallow a huge right hand & take a nap.
     
  6. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    I generally like the Klitschkos, but I don't like this move at all. Allegedly, they tried to make Haye enter a 4 fight deal. It looks like they settled on a 3 fight deal. I can't stand rematch clauses, but to outline a contract where Haye now has to fight both brothers and rematch one of them is ridiculous.
     
  7. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006
    "British heavyweight boxer David Haye could fight both Klitschko brothers as part of a sensational two-for-one contract being thrashed out by lawyers. Speaking to Setanta Sports News Haye admitted that the two-for-one contract was “being talked about”. He said:

    “To be number one in the world, to be the undisputed champion, I feel I’ve got to beat both of them anyway. That’s not a problem. I want to fight both of them. It’s down to the lawyers now.”

    Seems he was fine with the idea in February, now he’s not?. The problem is he has talked so much, he cant remember his own words:deal
     
  8. threethirteen

    threethirteen Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,366
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    Any idiot can see the Klitchskos did all they could to make the terms so punitive and awkward that almost noone would want to fight. My feeling is that the Klits make life very unpleasant for their opponents to break them mentally.

    If Wlad's so sure of beating Haye, why not do it as a one off with a rematch clause, why throw in Vitali? Sounds like they're shitting themselves.
     
  9. tysonlewisbook

    tysonlewisbook Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,632
    0
    Sep 18, 2008
    Well done CHEF. Haye says he will beat both brothers hes got those robots figured out and those are the two biggest money fights (by far) out there, so what's the problem? Maybe he'd rather fight Kingpin? Haye said he was ready, now he's got what he wanted.

    He should be ecstatic.
     
  10. gigogreco

    gigogreco Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,711
    4
    Jun 21, 2008
    yeah he states, he has to beat both to be recognised as the best, but where does he state, that he has to do it twice.?

    to me it seems like the klits are making those rematch clauses as an insurance policy. Perhaps they do feel, that the obstacle ahead of them, is tougher then most expect.

    i have no problem with a rematch clause, but it seems rather desperate to try and force haye to fight the klits for the rest of his career.
     
  11. tysonlewisbook

    tysonlewisbook Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,632
    0
    Sep 18, 2008
    Wlad is in the postiion of power. But he is fair. Name one other fighter who complained about Klitschko's negotiation tactics.
     
  12. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    The contract he has now calls for a 3 fight deal, not a two fight deal. Regardless, it's a ridiculous stipulation. If Haye truly wanted it to be that way, the Klits wouldn't have forced it into the contract.
     
  13. Random1

    Random1 Guest

    I said it yesterday in a different thread, just differently: If Haye didn't complain about the deal he got he wouldn't be David Haye. He's not Haye unless he's mouthing off. We'd think he'd gone soft if he said he liked the contract.

    Either way it's not that bad for him: If he beats all Klitschko's he'll be the Ring Magazine champ and we'll pretty much all call him undisputed champ. If he loses he'll cry all the way to the bank. I haven't heard anyone say just how much his purse is going to be, but I'm pretty sure he'll be a millionaire either way.
     
  14. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    Are you serious? Name another time where the Klits stipulated that their opponent had to agree to a 3 fight deal which would pit them against both brothers? Originally, the Klits allegedly wanted to make it a 4 fight deal. I don't how anyone could be ok with this.
     
  15. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    If he didn't have these bogus stipulations, he would be able to name his price against Vitali if were able to beat Wlad. As it stands now, he's forced to fight Vitali and has no negotiating power. He would owned by the Klits untill 2010 or 2011 if he's somehow succesful in winning 3 fights against the two brothers. And even if he does that, you can rest assured that at least two of his belts will have been stripped and the division will be even more fractured than it is now.