Walcott vs Wlad K?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, Apr 6, 2009.


  1. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,049
    Oct 25, 2006
    I'll go with Wlad here.

    He doesn't give you a whole lot to work with, with that style. He potshots from the outside and doesn't leave much opportunity for counters.
    Walcott won't put much pressure on Wlad - one of the things I believe Wlad can be susceptible to.
    Walcott will be sliding and shifiting and probably avoiding a good deal of what comes his way, but aside from a few sneaky counters (most of which won't land, or land flush) I don't see him doing a whole lot.

    Wlad on points in what most likely would be a terribly boring fight.
     
  2. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    Walcott is just the way classier fighter, I don't think Wlad has quite the power to take him out of there and he won't be outboxing him over 12 or 15.
     
  3. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    713
    May 22, 2007
    This a toss up for me maybe Walcott, especially if Wlad fought like he has recently. Walcott via close UD.
     
  4. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    You make some good points, but i really have to disagree here. Even in his prime, i don't think Louis' jab was as good as Wlad's. Well, maybe in a p4p sense, but coming from the 6'6 frame with that much speed, timing and consistency is hard to beat.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,671
    27,383
    Feb 15, 2006
    How many rematch clauses does Walcott have to sign up for to secure the fight?
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,468
    25,970
    Jan 3, 2007

    The more rematch clauses, the better off Walcott will be. It did afterall take in some 4 attempts to win a world title.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,671
    27,383
    Feb 15, 2006
    I dont think these rematch clauses help you if you are the challenger.
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,468
    25,970
    Jan 3, 2007

    Well, rematches are something that Jersey sure got enough of when he was challenging for a title. The difference between yesterday and today however is that now he'd have a slew of multiple titlists to challenge. I fear he may have to take a turn at all of them before finally getting some sort of a strap.
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,746
    Sep 14, 2005

    Well considering he WON the world title in first attempt, but got it taken away from him, I think thats a good trade off.
     
  10. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,468
    25,970
    Jan 3, 2007
    Walcott would have made an exciting cruiserweight-alpha titlist today.
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,746
    Sep 14, 2005
    cruiserweight? Sure he would dominate Maghoo. But I honestly believe Every heavyweight not named Wlad would get defeated by Walcott easily, and that includes a shopworn 38 year old vitali. I do believe walcott would step in the ring heavier if he were fighting today. Remember chris bryd is a natural 195lber who bulks himself up to 212lb for fights.


    I found something interesting in an article I read the otherday, doesnt have anything to do with thread.

    “I was robbed tonight without a pistol. He’s a great fighter. He had to be to take the punches he did tonight. I can beat him every time. I can trick him into any move I want to make. I’d like to fight him again tomorrow or any time. I was so far ahead, they (my handlers) told me to slow up in the last three rounds.” - Jersey Joe Walcott on Louis I fight
     
  12. Ponysmallhorse

    Ponysmallhorse Small but proud Full Member

    2,709
    6
    Mar 4, 2009
    Wlad doesn't have power? COME ON!!!!