Should Cotto's defeat be changed to a 'No Contest'

I saw it. I don't see what the big deal is.

 

No. He got his ASS beat I have it on tape.

 

:huh do you know spanish?

 

Actually, unless you have the wraps from AM's fight with Cotto, you don't have any proof. Why would we just investigate the Cotto fight, and not the other fights anyway?

 

Un poco

 

loaded or not Cotto whooped Margo's ass in the beginning rounds and then got tired and stopped moving and boxing cirlcles around Margo...then went to the ropes and let margo unload big slow ass haymakers...loaded or not Cotto was done.

he lost this fight for himself he still could have beat Margo had he continued to box every round like he was doing in the early rounds.

 

You can't have a no contest without proof he used it for THIS fight. Everybody knows he did. That's enough for Cotto's record.

 

Should Cotto's defeat be changed to a 'No Contest'
No, I think fans have the right to question everything, but we don't have the evidence, and we never will (even if an investigation is processed)to rightly accuse Margarito of cheating against Cotto. Has the possibility ever occured that maybe Margarito did not cheat against Cotto? I personally happen to lean towards he might have, but who really knows. If he did cheat, and that's why Margo won, then I'm pretty sure Cotto beats Margo in a rematch and sets the record straight. Also, the incident in the corner looks like nothing more than the corner asking Margo about Cotto's power, Capetillo did say "no pegada" but that just looked like he didn't want Margo to think about it, he just wanted him to pressure Cotto and fight his fight.

 

lol still going at it with my VW right? and FYI, i don't drive it anymore. why bring up **** about cars when im talking about boxing? you think saying "Cotto got beat" is something new? ummmm, good job at stating the obvious, im not wasting my time with your lack of knowledge, don't even open your mouth or type about boxing cuz its clear that you dont know ****, do what you know how to do - talk **** - and even with that you fail miserably

 

maybe...we'll never know, our spanish is different than Mexican spanish so the way the cornerman asked was weird...

BigReg, its all good...:nut


does anyone know where i can find the fight in spanish? meaning i dont want to hear the goddamn incompetent translator

 

You "think there is enough probable cause", here's an idea, quit thinking.

 

I think that Cotto should demand an investigation. If the conclusion of it turns out to be inconclusive or with no substantial proof he should stay with the L other wise, it would definately commend a NC rooling.

 

No.

There is circumstantial evidence that Marg cheated.

But the evidence is not conclusive.

Undoubtedly, many of Marg's 'victories' will be re-examined in light of the Mosley incident, but short of a confession, I think the result has to stand.


That doesn't mean we have to believe in our own minds that Cotto ever suffered a genuine defeat.

 

"Should" it be changed, in my own mind?

Yes.

As cuchulain said, there is sufficient circumstantial evidence to indicate that Margo cheated, and since the NV commission isn't really any more strict as any of the other commissions, it seems entirely likely that the gloves were loaded for previous fights.


"Will" it be changed?

Short of a confession, or incontroverable proof? Probably not.

 

Nevada is more strict than other commissions. They provide the gauze, they have guys carefully check and rechecking wraps, and they allow trainers of the opposition to sit in on the process. The only circumstancial evidence that Margo cheated was what happened in the Mosley fight and Cotto's face. But what about the evidence that he didn't cheat? Like the fact that nothing improper was detected by team Cotto or the commission, or the fact that the commission provided the gauze, or the fact that the Executive Director of the Commission cleared Margo of any wrong doing and stated he was certain he did nothing illegal.