Watching Pac-DLH again makes me believe...

I dont give a ****. who has he beat that was good in the PAST 7 YEARS???? thats what I thought. he anit been **** for the longest. Easiest money I've ever made.$3500 in 30 mins, iceing on the cake.

 

Ring Magazines P4P list

2006

1. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
2. Manny Pacquiao
3. Ronald (Winky) Wright
4. Jermain Taylor
5. Bernard Hopkins
6. Marco Antonio Barrera
7. Rafael Marquez
8. Ricky Hatton
9. Jose Luis Castillo
10. Joe Calzaghe

 

Wow, how naive some people must be. Do you honestly think that Nacho would admit that Oscar was weight drained? You do realise that an admission like that would basically mean Nacho saying "I've failed as a trainer". Nacho isn't going to admit that Oscar was weight drained, because it's a failure on his part.

 

Hatton was +220

 

Nacho is going to say what ever he has to say to take the blaim off of himself even Mayweather Sr said that they made him take the weight off the wrong way...

I dont care what your thoughts are on the matter people know when a fighter is not right~ you could clearly see that Oscar was not right that night he was not healthy

 

you cant look at a person physic and tell if they are shot or not..hell roy jones has the body of a god and is shot to ****

 

What has that got to do with anything? Oscar was a great fighter, with a fantastic career, and that career didn't just take place over the last 7 years. It seems there are a lot of people with very short memories.

 

so can we drop the "oscar looks like a corps/skeleton" adjective now in describing the oscar that fought pac?

 

Apparently some people can't see what is blatantly obvious.

 

dude your the one talking about how he was past his prime and weight dranied and stuff, but in reality he hasnt beat anybody good in 7 years!!! so he just wasnt past his prime against Pacquaio hes been garbage for the longest. ppl just trying to take away from Pacquaios win, DLH can never be the boxer Pacquaio was. you can compare resumes right now and it anit even close.

 

ok. i did see that castillo was rated at #9 p4p year-end of 2006. even if he was p4p#9 at that time, he was already old and way past his prime. he was also having a lot of difficulty by that time making 140 for that fight. that's why he's already fighting now at welter.

 

Not with Pacquiaos Balls tea bagging their eyes of course not!~:good

 

No that would mean nothing of failure Oscar brought in a nutritional specialist Nachos only job was to get him boxing right and give him a gameplan

 

In the last seven years Oscar beat Sturm, Vargas, Mayorga, got robbed against Mosley and lost a SD to the P4P King in Mayweather. Oscar's absolute prime was arguabley between 1998-2001.

There is no doubt that the version of De La Hoya that fought Pacquiao was the worst version version of De La Hoya that we have ever seen in the ring. There is no doubt that he was a decade past prime, there is no doubt he was 36 years old, and there is no doubt he was weight drained.
It was a good win for Pacquaio, nothing more.

Prime-for-prime Oscar would have probably won via KO.

 

its too convenient for these guys to say that oscar was only past his prime after the pacquiao fight. why? because he lose terribly and a former flyweight was not suppose to do this to a former middleweight champion.