patterson vs marciano late 56 or 57

atschatschatschatsch:shock::shock::shock::shock::shock:

 

I am 100% sure Mr. Marvel is Revolver, Megaman, Homicide Hank, Pepping it. If you really don't think he is, then you must be caught in the middle of a brainfog. The evidence is there! It is clearly him, no if ands or butts. He is back and trying to be more laid back with his opinions, but sometimes he comes out with his same old arrogant self. His opinions writing and "Insults" are all the same as Revolver's, it is clearly him. I hope he gets Banned.

 

Suzie he has been posting for before a few weeks since you came back and caused no trouble and has been an alright poster so i reckon you should lay off it just now just in case its not him as it wouldnt be very nice if it wasnt him wouldnt it

 

Gpator,

I like you alot man and we share the same opinions mostly, but you were not a member of this forum 3-4 years ago so you have no idea what went on. This poster...Revolver...Literally destroyed the classic section of ESB. We lost more good posters than Russians in world war II because of him. We nearly had to shut the classic section down Revolver had taken it over with his slander and trolling. Finally we got him Banned. 1 year later he managed to sneak back with new names Megaman, Pepping it, and Homicide Hank...Everyone here knew all aliases were Revolver, of course he refused to admit it, but we exposed him and he soon dissapeared(coincidently all 3 names at the same time!)...... Now all of a sudden Mr. Marvel appears. Mr. Marvel's opinions, writings, etc are near IDENTICIAL to that of Revolver, Megaman, Pepping it, Homicide Hank......and though he has remained laid back, I fear a future outbreak of his same slander and trolling once again. It is quite clear if you do some research Mr. Marvel is Revolver. He needs to be banned forever. No room here for a man like that.

 

thats pretty bad man but the guy hasnt done anything, hes innocent until proven guilty but to be fair he has had plenty of oppertunities to be a prickk and has refrained form it
n here knew mealso good to hear you like me, i even wondered if people o

 

Revolver, not sure if it is him. We wait and see, and lets not jump into conclusions.

He may have the same thoughts as Revolver, and thats ok, I can lived with that, but once he says 56 is the cut off mark ete, ok perhaps.

 

I don't like Marciano's chronic back problems-this IMO affected his one punch KO power.
I see this fight going into the late rounds,which would be in the younger man's favour.

 

Well you didn't outright deny that you were the poster who went by the name Revolver. I'll leave the members of the classic forum to draw their own conclusions.

What was about this Revolver's posts that were so aggravating anyway?

 

I'll leave it to one of the other posters here to tell you :rofl:rofl

 

Joe Louis sucks
Rocky Marciano sucks
The "Modern" era started on April 27 1956.
Louis fought nothing but Bums.
I agree with the most part for Dempsey lol.
Marciano fought bums, fix fights, in the mob, had loses overturn into wins ete, White trash.

Talk smack about Barney Ross.

 

You made me laugh out loud with that

 

And lets not forget the credit he gave L Spinks for suppose victorys over evey one from Marciano back to Sullivan.

Than he says middleweights fighting for the title in the 50's(Charles, Moore, Walcott,) and some won the title, proves its weak, than I made a comment on Jr and Toney beating Ruiz and winning a title, and he trys to write that off or something.

 

Anyone remember Revolver's top 20 heavyweights of all time list? I remember he had Marciano at 17, Louis was not in the top 20, he had Bowe and Norton in the top 10.

 

Will give him credit with Marciano over Louis, mostly because Rock came later than Louis, so he ate better thaan Louis.

Patterson came later than Marciano, so he ate better than Marciano. And it goes down the line for the most part. Well outside of Ali of couse.

 

On another boxing forum I was told that Muhammad Ali "invented" handspeed and that Tye Fields (pre-Monte Barrett) would have a serious chance against a prime George Foreman because of his size but old George would likely beat Fields because the size difference isn't as significant. :huh