Greater fighter? Thomas Hearns or Mike Tyson?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PernellSweetPea, Apr 8, 2009.

  1. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    12,108
    Likes Received:
    5,698
    Hearns had more of an ability to improve or modify his style when he slowed down more than Tyson did. Who knows why the real ATG's have this ability but they do. A guy who did not improve much when he got older was Delahoya. Hearns improvised more than Leonard or Oscar. Hagler improvised also. Hearns did, Hagler did and Tyson did not. So that might be the mark of a real ATG. Duran actually improvised well also. Not all the time, but sometimes.
     
  2. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    34,796
    Likes Received:
    64
    Like Hearns, Hopkins is the king of learning how to extend his career with experience. The guy is incredible.
     
  3. DirtMcGirt

    DirtMcGirt Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    272
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'll go for hearns
     
  4. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    34,796
    Likes Received:
    64
    It is more onesided for Hearns than I thought it would be when I first saw this thread.
     
  5. cpnasty

    cpnasty Fight Fan 83 Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,663
    Likes Received:
    5
    Tommy
     
  6. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    12,108
    Likes Received:
    5,698
    Sounds like Hearns is the greater fighter. Pretty convincing. Not even close.
     
  7. Jinx

    Jinx Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,839
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mike is the youngest heavyweight champ ever and was destroying good fighters with ease...nuff said
     
  8. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    12,108
    Likes Received:
    5,698
    Seems like the consensus is that Hearns had the better longevity and quality of opposition. I agree.
     
  9. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    12,108
    Likes Received:
    5,698
    98 votes so far. an even 100 would be good.
     
  10. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    34,796
    Likes Received:
    64
    Hearns beat out Tyson pretty convincinly that is for sure.
     
  11. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    Messages:
    3,980
    Likes Received:
    17
    nothing new - Hearns
     
  12. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    34,796
    Likes Received:
    64
    And the winner and still champ. Thomas "Hit Man" Hearns.
     
  13. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    12,108
    Likes Received:
    5,698
    And Hearns is going to fight soon, but that is a big mistake.
     
  14. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    22,661
    Likes Received:
    4
    Hearns and it's not even close. the 29 that voted tyson are idiots.
     
  15. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    18,129
    Likes Received:
    27
    The only thing Tyson has over Hearns is chin. If both fighters were the same size, Hearns would also have an advantage in punching power.