THIS JUST IN: Paul's Win against Winky was BETTER than Any of Mayweather's WINS

Pimp C, what now?

All of a sudden Winky is an unskilled garbage fighter?

You're a smart guy and you know there is some validity in my statement. Sure, it was made with the intention of making people angry which is funny to me, but there is truth in this.

Corrales was dangerous but very unskilled.

De La Hoya was dangerous, but old.

Winky was not at peak form, but close to it and was completely anhiliated, but there are other factors involved too.

I feel that Paul was the bigger and stronger man despite what their weights were. Mayweather generally doesn't have this advantage over his opponents.

Once I realize how big and strong Paul was, I realized that Winky had no chance. He would have needed an equalizer which would be his punch, and he just didn't have it.

Props to Paul though, but Rudyard and that other guy Nallage are homosexuals for sure.

 

You're right that I will call out PBF for his duckingness which is well documented.

But you're wrong about why I'm on the Williams bandwagon. The guy is a solid fighter and he proved me wrong. I honestly thought Winky would be too much for him, but Paul showed vast improvements, beyond simply being the bigger stronger man.

I think he could potentially beat Pavlik and Abraham too.

 

That's where you need a history lesson, my son. Ezzard Charles, Archie Moore, and Jersey Joe Walcott are just three examples of guys that seemed to be in their prime at an older age.

Hopkins and Mosley are two fighters that recently put on PRIME like displays, so it's easy to say on PAPER that Winky was FAR removed from his prime, but unfortunately for you, I actually watched the fight.

Winky just didn't have the tools to compete with Williams, and I don't care if Winky is in his prime. I thought the one major advantage that Winky would have would be his size, but it turned out that Williams was the bigger and stronger man.

Once I realize this, my theory about who would win was almost completely flushed down the toilet, but it was further reduced when I noticed how adept Paul had become at throwing uppercuts and tying his man up on the inside.

Winky had no punch, so his chance of winning the fight from that moment on was almost zero.

They say the last thing to go on a fighter is his punch, and I don't think Winky's workrate would have been enough to gain the decision, even in his prime due to as what I mentioned before, Paul's ability to tie his man up on the inside along with uppercuts to discourage his man from opening up, and Paul's supernatural workrate.

 

The thing is, you're a guy who's never put on gloves and basically just likes to dick ride.

I'm a risk analysis type of person who doesn't get on a man's dick just because he's the hottest thing, but I make objective opinions about who I think will win.

Now many credible sources, including Hopkins and the Ring voted said that Winky would win. Considering Winky is a very good boxer and one of the better ones of this generation, I assumed that his skills along with most importantly, HIS SIZE would be a major factor in this fight.

And while Paul did connect at a lower rate than Winky as the majority of his punches were blocked off of Paul's gloves as I suggested, please bring up proof of this, Paul improved substantially and turned out to be the BIGGER, STRONGER man which was pivotal in my analysis of Winky.

And while it did cross my mind that perhaps Paul was bigger than I thought, after reading that Bernard said Winky would use his size to bully Paul, and considering Bernard fought Winky first hand and knows how big Winky is, and considering Winky fought at LTHVY his last fight, I solidified my point by suggesting that Winky's size, skill, and workrate would be sufficient to give him the TKO as I had visions of Paul getting his ass beat by Quintana, and yes it was an ass beating.

It's called rolling the dice. If I got that prediction right, I would look like a genius, but if wrong, no problem. Either way, I don't really give a **** about people's opinions. Ya'll should just listen to me because I understand how fighting works and what works against opponents and what doesn't.

Am I wrong at times.........yes.

But people like you say things like......oh he's faster......he'll win, without actually looking at the intangibles.

And considering that you have a picture of Floyd without his shirt off in your wallet, yeah, that's gay.

So in conclusion, yes, you are gay.