Which modern day British fighter do you regard as the least greatest?

"Fraud" is a harsh word, but Hatton has the biggest smoke and mirrors career.

He never fought anybody that was a live threat unless all the money and glory was stacked in his favour. NEVER would he think about putting his applecart at risk against somebody like Junior Witter, or Miguel Cotto. He always waited until he was in a no lose situation.

In summary, his resume is sub-par and his skills do not impress me at all. I don't see anything impressive in him except brute strength, if he'd have fought better boxers in his career he'd have many losses.

 

Funnily enough, i'm not :hey

 

this is hard i vote Jeff Thomas

 

good

 

I suppose arguments could be made against all of them actually, for varying reasons.

 

i wont respond to this shite thread.

oops!

 

i think hamed maby, because im really struggling to pick one

 

Flint the reason for any negativity was your original thread title

'Which top British fighter was or is the biggest fraud of the modern era'

Which fighter is the lesser great is far more reasonable as they all achieved highly in their careers.

 

David Haye.

 

How is a Pacquiao a no lose fight, you muppet?

It's at Hatton's best weight against a guy who started about 5 weights lower, Hatton will get hammered if he loses this fight.

 

Hatton.
A British version of De La Hoya. A seriously manufactured and manouvred career.....and the kind of guy who blows his own trumpet with a load of bull**** facts.
DLH just claimed he won world titles at x weights, that included taking the WBO strap off Felix Sturm with massive help from the judges. He got whipped next up but the real middle champ at the time, Hopkins.
We ain't all stupid, just most.

 

Enzo