I dont see many Pac fans downplaying Hatton's win against tsyzu...they may say Tsyzu was past it which he slightly was proven by his record after the fight, but not shot or that he gets 0 credit for the fight. Same with Morales 2, no one calls him prime...but he was elite at the time albeit past it. Off the top of my head, I would rate the Tsyzu as probably the 2nd best win of the last decade.
You're deluding yourself..I know you're a MAB fan, but Barrera can't beat Pacquiao..He's a southpaw and too fast..Thats just the way it is..deal with it...:hey:hey:hey
What's the point of this thread? Why can't Pac school JMM when someone like Chris John beat him? If John can beat someone like JMM why was he only able to score a draw against Juarez? :huh It's all about styles, simple as that. This thread is crap.
stop defending him whatarock ... you are defending a guy who once agreed that pac wont last 4 rounds with hatton
john got all the luck in the JMM fight...close rounds were given to him.. okay, so would you say that morales has limited styles? my answer to this thread is because, morales wanted to win via KO against his rival and doesnt take advantage of his reach advantage...but ofcourse, we can not forget that pac is really such a special fighter
and do you think this is a very intellectual and strong argument...? "Just re-watched the first Morales/Pacuiao fight. Man, what a schooling Morales gave him. Embarrasing stuff to be outclassed in a boxing match by a fellow puncher with his own boxing limitations the way Pacquiao was. Erik just had his way with him, even went southpaw toward the end just to spite him. Man, Pacquiao got owned, and to make matters worse, Morales was past his prime". thats bitterness for me LOL atschatschatsch
john got all the luck in the JMM fight...close rounds were given to him.. okay, so would you say that morales has limited styles? my answer to this thread is because, morales wanted to win via KO against his rival and doesnt take advantage of his reach advantage...but ofcourse, we can not forget that pac is really such a special fighter
Facts, my friend, check your facts. 2-1 for PACMAN, and it's a brutal TKO. Morales was just lucky (?) for the HEADBUTT that's why he won or else he won't have lasted 12 rounds just like the 2 and 3. :hat
Right and karma is a ***** because Juarez got the home cooked draw decision vs John. So you did have a point in your own way. I guess this looked like another "stir the pot" thread. Too much of that going around in this place.
You must have forgotten about the HEADBUTT that started the mismatch. With blood oozing while fighting, is that fair competition? I know HEADBUTT happens and yes part of the game, but that alone can spell disaster. He lost because he was fighting one eyed and yet he lasted 12 rounds. Is that a sign of ownage? Had MORALES been in that situation, he wouldn't have lasted for another 3 rounds after round 5. :hat
that shows heart.. what about barrera's performance against pacquiao, i see dirtiness rather than heart
Sorry I was away, I was just continuously rewatching Morales/Pacquiao I. I'm high right now and seeing a fighter get schooled so horribly by a past prime fighter is just too hilarious for words. That fight must be to *******s what the Holocaust is to German people. Good times.