Quigley v Oakey @ 168

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by colinthfc, Apr 17, 2009.


  1. colinthfc

    colinthfc Guest

    Imagine a packed arena full of scousers and pompey fans in a real domestic dust up. Oakey always seems fleshy and I believe you would see a better fighter in him at Super Middle
     
    colinthfc, Apr 17, 2009
    colinthfc, Apr 17, 2009
    #1
  2. LHL

    LHL Captain Freedom Full Member

    23,826
    3
    Oct 27, 2008
    Sounds like an awesome fight on paper
     
    LHL, Apr 17, 2009
    LHL, Apr 17, 2009
    #2
  3. neil hibbert

    neil hibbert Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,143
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    be a crackin atmosphere like
     
    neil hibbert, Apr 18, 2009
    neil hibbert, Apr 18, 2009
    #3
  4. kieron

    kieron Active Member Full Member

    1,098
    1
    Oct 30, 2008
    I still don't get why Quigley doesn't fight at 160. Against Dodson he proved to have a great chin against a natural powerful super-middle and as he is deffo carrying some timber why not boil the last 7-8 lbs off and compete at middle where he could be a bit of a monster
     
    kieron, Apr 18, 2009
    kieron, Apr 18, 2009
    #4
  5. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    15,860
    653
    Jan 9, 2009
    tony.s work rate would be to much for most super middle weights,he deserves a shot at anoyher title,a credit to boxing
     
    billy nelson, Apr 18, 2009
    billy nelson, Apr 18, 2009
    #5
  6. colinthfc

    colinthfc Guest

    How would you rate Oakey against Froch at 168?
     
    colinthfc, Apr 18, 2009
    colinthfc, Apr 18, 2009
    #6
  7. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    15,860
    653
    Jan 9, 2009
    oakey 4-5 years ago would have given any super middle weight or L/H a good argument and still could at british or euro level,although froch is way above domestic level
     
    billy nelson, Apr 19, 2009
    billy nelson, Apr 19, 2009
    #7