I was quoting PHILLA. Morales was past prime by the 3rd fight with Barrera, and by the time he came against Raheem..it showed he was done.
Barrera was either prime or damn close to it the first time they fought and Manny completly dominated him. I think Manny beats him 8 times out of 10. If Barrera boxes he stands a chance if he exchanges he gets KO's 10 times out of 10.
Morales is so overrated by the Pac haters. Morales could lose to Raheem in his prime too. Raheem ran all fight long, he could possibly do that to a prime Erik. Also Pac wasn't even in his prime when he fought Morales either . Pac is a better fighter now. And what TheWoo said. Barrera was either prime, or close to it. And it wasn't even close. A slightly better Barrera would completely turn the tables? Haha, right.
What excuses will the *******s who say Pac will win What excuses will the *******s who say Pac will win have if Pac loses? [url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=108475[/url]
true.. the plaster boy would have no chance in landing his heavy glued gloves.... true story. :good:good:good:good
and let me quote you about your stupidity in pre pac-hoya fight.... Pac vs DLH!!! Boxing needs it!!! This fight is pointless. Pacquiao would be starched by somebody as big as Del La Hoya, who has been knocking out welterweights his entire career. Boxing doesn't need this, Boxing needs Cotto vs Margarito and we've got it. [url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=76207&page=3[/url] :good
BTW I think the whole hate thing is very childish. I don't see why you can't be a fan of Barrera, Morales, and Pacquiao. All are great fighters.