Manny Pacquiao and his greatness.....

Pacquiao has been a cherry picker of past prime fighters with a name except for JMM who many believe beat Pac twice and is the real P4P #1!

True Story!:deal

 

In the 2 years leading into the pacman fight Marco had beaten Morales, Tapia and Kevin Kelley. Afterwards he won 6 fights in a row Including fights against Morales, Juarez, abd peden going undefeated for over 3 years before finally losing a very close decision to a prime JMM. Combine that with the fact that he was the reigning featherweight king and in pretty much everyone's top 5 p4p and anyone that says he was shot in the first fight is a complete idiot.

 

Agree! *******'s call it hating while others know it's just the reality of Pacquiao's career.

 

The sad thing is that once Pacquiao is done, *******'s will jump on the Nonito Donaire bandwagon and claim they were fans all along!

 

By this criteria Barrera, Morales and Marquez are not great fighters either. In 3 fights there is just a coupld of rounds seperating Barrera and Morales and Marquez fought on extremly close terms with a past prime barrera. None of these guys have really set themself apart from the others in their encounters I guess that means none of them are great.

 

pac haters claiming they're only stating facts can't accept that barrera was not past his prime when pac beat his azz the first time.

 

Barrera got a win over a peak Hamed, Morales and Barrera hold wins over each other in their peak. Do I think Morales and Barrera are ATGs not exactly I dont and I wouldnt really either if they are they are not rated very high.

 

Your stupid becuase you think other wise:deal Roach himself said that Morales was shot going into the first fight how stupid can you ****ing be? seriously and his loss to raheem clearly indicates he was done.

 

It's funny you say that because some of this Roach has said himself but *******'s deny it. I told a ******* that the Mayweather fight took something out of Hatton and he has not been the same since and they of course brushed it off. Then I posted a video where Roach says the same thing and of course I got no response back.

 

I think that a ton of Hamed fans would disagree greatly that Hamed was at his peak when Barrera beat him. I'll put it to you like this Hamed was about as close to his prime when Barrera spanked him as Barrera was when pacquiao spanked him.

Morales and barrera have wins over one another but in very close fights, just like pacquiao has a win over marquez in a very close fight.

 

So what if Pacquiao learned alot from the Morales loss, he is still fighting washed up fighters that will not get him an ATG rating, he is going to have to fight the best in their prime, starting with Hatton.

Look Manny is a great fighter nobody is or can dispute that but to sit here and lable him as the best thing since sliced bread is just over board, my question to you is, other than Morales MAB DLH and JMM who has Pacquiao beat? and in their peak? narrow win over JMM okay, but that is about it~

he is going to be tested in this fight, and I think too much time has gone by for Pacquiao to be ready for this kind of test he has feasted on a bunch of dead guys and went life and death with a peak JMM, and that was at Pacquiaos best weight, 140 is Hattons and we will see the death of Manny Pacquiao on the 2nd.

No doubt Hatton stops him.

 

That is not true though, Hamed was at his best when he fought Barrera, the problem is that they were looking for the Barrera that fought McKenny and Jones, not the boxer counter puncher they ended up with.

Hamed has no excuse he was in his prime he was undefeatd and he got beat clearly I dont care what the Hamed fans say they cant lie about this.