I Take Back Everything I Said About Boxrec Ratings, AKA Carl Froch, Number One

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cobbler, Apr 26, 2009.


  1. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008
    Technically he's far from the best but in term of recent activity then he probably should be there
     
  2. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Nope,they are ****.
    Kessler should be no 1 everywhere.
     
  3. Vengeance

    Vengeance Certified Headhunter Full Member

    1,820
    0
    Mar 13, 2009
    Kessler has not done **** in forever. You don't retain your #1 ranking if you continue not doing **** while guys like Bute and Froch continue to win against good competition.
     
  4. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008
    You should stick to your opinions when they are right, instead of agreing when your man is called number one. I suppose when Bute beats Green, he'll get the number one spot again. All that means nothing until fighters face others. I still rank Kessler number but not for a long time. If he stays inactive, I'll put someone else, even if I'll still think he may be the best.
     
  5. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Nah, that's no fun! This thread is very much tongue in cheek :p
     
  6. AffectedToaster

    AffectedToaster Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,918
    0
    Feb 28, 2009
    i agree Froch should be no. 1 because he took a big risk and it paid off
     
  7. djm

    djm Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,208
    2
    Dec 17, 2006
    God bless BoxRec rankings. We'd have so many fewer threads without them.

    For the record: the cheekiness of the thread was apparent to anyone willing to listen.