Taylor - Froch. Classic opinion?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Dave's Top Ten, Apr 25, 2009.


  1. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    :lol::lol:

    Good line, well done mate!:good
     
  2. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    its true though and its so ironic he probably has the leas appropriate nickname ever
     
  3. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,734
    3,580
    Jul 10, 2005
    It was nearly a replay of the Pavlik fight. Hell the knockdown was just like a snapshot from the Pavlik fight, on the ropes and sitting there.

    Just amazing of that.
     
  4. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    havent saw the Pavlik fight but saqw his title defences before that fight i have the second pavlik fight sopmewhere but havent watched it
     
  5. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,734
    3,580
    Jul 10, 2005
    I have the fight, pretty amazing fight, one of my all times faves.

    I judge the Froch Taylor fight off of Youtube of couse, but after seeing the first Pavlik fight a 100 times, lol. I can recall it well.

    Is your copy of the rematch ppv? or the HBO reaired? Belive it was during a replay of a Wlad fight?? Thompson? perhaps.
     
  6. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    dont know its just the fight itself
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,675
    27,389
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that Froch is one of those fighters where technicaly they dont add up, but based on raw talent and intangibles they are going to be a nightmare for anybody.

    This cook will only make spicey dishes.
     
  8. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,153
    Oct 22, 2006

    I think anyone who has watched Johnny 'The Entertainer' Nelson fight; may beg to differ!
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    :lol:

    Hey, he was a purist's dream:lol:
     
  10. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    yeh your right

    i wouldnt say fight more move in front of tv cameras for 45 mins

    when your dreaming yu dont need to be put to sleep
     
  11. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
  12. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,734
    3,580
    Jul 10, 2005

    I belive people look to much into the technicaly side of this, just because Froch does not fight like Hopkins or DLH or Ali does not mean he sucks or is a bad fighter or bum(Gen fourms comments)

    For evey Ali, there is a Joe Fraizer, for evey Marciano there is a Walcott.

    Hell no matter how technicaly surpast Joe Gans is compare to Battling Nelson, Gans was always going to have hell with Nelson.
    And there 3 fights prove it. Some times its not skill that wins, but Will, heart and brute force. As was the case here.
     
  13. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    Early in his career Nelson could be very entertaining and exciting believe it or not. Believe it or not Ruiz was more entertaining pre-Tua

    As for Froch, he's not an elite fighter, he'd be schooled by Calzaghe/BHOPs and would have lost this 1 if Taylor didn't have **** poor stamina
     
  14. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    yes but technically Froch is terrible i didnt realise how bad his footwork is
     
  15. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    yeh i remember Ruiz being a kinda boxer-puncher

    but Nelson exciting i watched an exhibition with him in it for charity and it put me to sleep